Krishna's logic?

Hello MKAPIANs,

I absolutely hate it when CVS show Krishna to be dumb.

I mean, what is his logic, he is making a khayali puloa, or he doesn't understand or trust his wife? Or since he is not law literate he is just scared of Garv's fate? In any case, he should talk to Pratigya, is it so difficult? Gosh!!

In the precap, Krishna will be shown breaking down (ouch my heart) and then he will probably confide in Komal and then Komal advises him to tell everything to SS and that only SS can save Garv.

I was surprised when Krishna said, that this case is of Pratigya and she will not leave the culprit and that SS will not stop her.

Nonsense!!!, Krishna!! Garv is innocent even Pratigya will understand that, she is the mother of the child. You keep saying she will not leave the apraadi , so do you yourself think Garv is the apraadi?

This logic is beyond me, CVS couldn't you have thought something else for Krishna to hide the truth!! 15 years of marriage of Kriya and this is the trust level Krishna has, bravo!!

Krishna is ultimately proving he is back to being "Bail-buddhi"

On some level, it is evident that like Sumitra, he didn't whole-heartedly support Pratigya being a government criminal lawyer due to the risks it poses to her and his family, but compromised due to love.

But worms are spilling out of the can now as her cases are directly related to their family.

My only question is, if he had to go in "duniya ko aag lagai denge" (will set the world on fire) mode eventually, why didn't he do it at the first place, tell Balwant the truth and face consequences like the brat he is? SS is no longer a goon but he still has connections, they could have helped??

If he had to stay low key, he could have just shut up. Trying to wipe fingerprints, setting the van on fire and producing false accused Radhe is only further pointing that the case is not accidental but deliberate.

We saw that Balwant conveniently ignored the child sized spectacles as someone's who may have also been playing there like his son, similarly police might as well have never identified Garv's fingerprints or if they did, they would have considered he was just playing and never suspected he could even drive a van (though we know that it was Samar who plugged in the ignition)

Originally posted by: NiharikaMishra

Krishna is ultimately proving he is back to being "Bail-buddhi"

On some level, it is evident that like Sumitra, he didn't whole-heartedly support Pratigya being a government criminal lawyer due to the risks it poses to her and his family, but compromised due to love.

But worms are spilling out of the can now as her cases are directly related to their family.

My only question is, if he had to go in "duniya ko aag lagai denge" (will set the world on fire) mode eventually, why didn't he do it at the first place, tell Balwant the truth and face consequences like the brat he is? SS is no longer a goon but he still has connections, they could have helped??

If he had to stay low key, he could have just shut up. Trying to wipe fingerprints, setting the van on fire and producing false accused Radhe is only further pointing that the case is not accidental but deliberate.

Exactly, Krishna is making things worse from Day 1 for the case. My point here is, why does he think that Pratigya will not support Garv. There is no indication from season 1 at all that Pratigya has taken a stand against something he did not want her to do, he has always supported her. So him hiding things from Pratigya in the pretense of saving Garv is baffling and so out of his character!! I mean the depth of love he is shown having for Pratigya, he should be trusting her the most.