Wrong concept of Mamta??

zee-usa thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#1

Hi All

Just now I was watching Mamta, I saw that Mamta is the surrogate mother of Krish. Which means that Krish is still the son of Akshat and his wife(dont know her name).

She was JUST the surrogate mother. How can she say that Krish is the son of Akshat and hers?

Please tell me ..

Deepika

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

1.1k

Users

7

Frequent Posters

Chits1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#2
U will understand this if u are mature. 😉
zee-usa thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#3
No, I mean even in the Reth that girl carried the baby of samar and his wife, but still they were the parents not that vamp.( I am using words "that" and "wife" coz I am very bad at names).
But I am sure u r smart enough to u/satnd it.
😊
91118 thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: zee-usa

Hi All

Just now I was watching Mamta, I saw that Mamta is the surrogate mother of Krish. Which means that Krish is still the son of Akshat and his wife(dont know her name).

She was JUST the surrogate mother. How can she say that Krish is the son of Akshat and hers?

Please tell me ..

Deepika

Hey...i'm not sure if this is right..but i don't think mamta's the surrogate mother..in hte march 20th episode, she comes outright and says that krish is her's and akshays...so since tanisha's uterus, i think, was damaged...mamta must have been the real biological mother

KkUsUm04 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#5
being a surrogate mother doesnt really mean that it has to come from both parents....yes the egg was mamtas and sperm was akshats but bottom line was that mamta got paid 4 having that baby....and that lady (4got her name too) has rights over the kid...for example say a women wants to have a baby but she cant....but her husband can...in that sense 4 them to have a baby...they will need an egg from another women...but yet that baby will belong to tat women who cant have the baby... sorry if im confusing you all.. but i hope you al understand what im writing here. 😃
addicted4ever thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#6
Yes... i agree - but then tanisha is no mum to krish... she did this for money - her selfishness Mamta did this for her father - well she still luves the kid...
zee-usa thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#7
Cool, so it is not really clear to any of us. If Mamta is just the surrogate mother or also the donor. But I think there is no egg from Mamta. 😕 Coz that mausi asked her to "rent her kokh" she didnt ask to donate and rent, u know what I am saying. 😆
shudain thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#8
Do you really expect the serial to be completely accurate? They have shown Akshay's father recovering from Alzheimer's when it is a world known fact that there is no cure for the disease (I should know…I work for a company that makes the drug to slow the disease down).
Chits1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#9
guys,chill,mamta is the surrogate mother,which means,the sperm of akshay was injected to her and so the egg donor is obviously mamta.That is the reason,she is so attached to the child.She knows that akshay is the father,so she gets attached to him too.Tanisha is not capable of producing a child,not even an egg 😆
dostokedost thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#10
I also think that mamta is the real mother of Karish not Tanisha no matter if mamta is sarrogate mother...........Anyway thanks for sharing................

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".