Is this sameer aka aditya's motive?

Page

Twinklestar139

@Twinklestar139

Voyager

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Hey all! after watching todays episode i'm damn sure everything is done for property. Here are the reasons why.

BTW there were actually alot of hint in todays episode aka february 20 about the reason behind the whole drama.

Well here are the reasons why i think that its all done for property.

1. In todays episode there was a flashback showing how madhurima wanted all of the property instead of 30%

2. She wanted to get more property on her side and therefore wanted a heir for her family

3.I think madhurima cant be a mother thats why aditya/sameer and madhu planned to trap shikha for a baby

4. Also the reason why they didnt adopt a child and trapped shikha is i think because if you adopt a child the government or some next comppany checks evry year if the child is safe or not

5. Finally, now that they have the baby, until they dont get the property they are going to pretend to be happy and once they succedd they will plan to kill the baby as they never wanted one

So do you guys think this is possibly the reason? comment what u think below.

Edited by Twinklestar139 - 11 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Benzaiten

@Minionite

Channel Moderator

+ 45

Posted: 11 years ago

Yep it was all for property.
I think it was more to show her family that she can take on responsibility. What bigger responsibility than having a child?
I think it's more that she didn't want to be a mother. I mean she looks like one of those who is health conscious all the time.
Possibly. And it may also be why they didn't go the surrogate route because there's always the fear of the surrogate mother coming back for her child.
I hope not. I mean the rest of the family is pretty attached to the child. They can't just kill him.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Ms.SK

@Ms.SK

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

I am assuming mahima's dad think the child Manav (arnav) is mahima's own child. If that is the case then:-

What I want to know is where was Mahima for 9 months (supposed to be pregnant) and how did Aditiya/Sameer's absence for 2+ years not questioned by in-laws???? Have I missed something??

Quote

asha222

@asha222

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Ms.S.K.
I am assuming mahima's dad think the child Manav (arnav) is mahima's own child. If that is the case then:-

What I want to know is where was Mahima for 9 months (supposed to be pregnant) and how did Aditiya/Sameer's absence for 2+ years not questioned by in-laws???? Have I missed something??

Hi, Sameer and Madhurima were supposed to have been in London for over 2 years. That's why her family can't verify if it's really her child.

Quote

asha222

@asha222

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

Even if it was all for property, and they can't adopt a child because of the legal work involved. They still could have went the surrogate way.

It's easier to find a poor willing woman to carry someone's child and kill her off after than trapping Shikha's whole family for over 2 years and then try to kill her.

Their stupid plan was made more complicated for no reason.

Quote

Ms.SK

@Ms.SK

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

@asha222. thanks for the info.

let us hope there is another motive to all this drama apart from heir for more share of property. have a feeling aditya/sameer will back stab mahima

Quote

Twinklestar139

@Twinklestar139

Voyager

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: asha222
Even if it was all for property, and they can't adopt a child because of the legal work involved. They still could have went the surrogate way.
It's easier to find a poor willing woman to carry someone's child and kill her off after than trapping Shikha's whole family for over 2 years and then try to kill her.

Their stupid plan was made more complicated for no reason.

that is exactly what i was thinking as well. but then there also must be a reason behind not doing surrogacy. oh well lets just see what happens.