Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread #4/ DT's Nt pg 29

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1091

Anjana I dont get your question.. answer to first question is as Dury thinks he is the right heir to the throne Karna also thinks the same.. Dury being son of current King.. forget karyakari raja part..

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#1092

Diala - exactly Dhrit is just Regent in place of Pandu... I don't get what makes Karna think Dury has suffered any injustice? He is not entitled by birth or samarth to the throne.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1093

Karna believes what Dury thinks.. it was Dhrid's throne that went to Pandu owing to his blindness.. which was injustice to Dhrid.. now that Dury's fit enough he reclaims what actually should have been his father's.. this is what I think Dury thinks.. this being a debatable situation there is no surprise that Karna agree with him..

PS: ⭐️ applies everywhere possible

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#1094

Originally posted by: ...Diala...
Karna believes what Dury thinks.. it was Dhrid's throne that went to Pandu owing to his blindness.. which was injustice to Dhrid.. now that Dury's fit enough he reclaims what actually should have been his father's.. this is what I think Dury thinks.. this being a debatable situation there is no surprise that Karna agree with him..

PS: ⭐️ applies everywhere possible

problem with this belief remains - SAMARTH. Dury is not Samarth and per StarKarna he was Samarth so he should have been allowed to fight Arjuna. By the same token Dury is Asamarth to be King.

Anyhu I get my flaw -->⭐️ effect and logic is oxymoron

Quote

Diala D

@...Diala...

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#1095

why is Dury asamarth to be king? I dont think Karna knows Dury's childhood history 😕

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#1096

Originally posted by: ...Diala...
why is Dury asamarth to be king? I dont think Karna knows Dury's childhood history 😕

If he had any samarth then he would not need Karna... without Karna, Bhisma, etc... he can't defeat Pandavas ergo he is asamarth vis a vis Arjuna. In Ranghbhoomi of StarBharat Arjuna was most Samarth not Dury. StarDury could not even befriend Jarasandh without Karna😆 and tomorrow Bheem will kill him.

Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 11 years ago

Quote

Arijit

@Arijit007

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#1097

sorry for interupting you serious discussions, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, TOMORROW A SPECTACKULARE WRESTLING MATCH WILL HAPPEN, ON ONE CORNER THERE WILL BE THE EMPEROR OF MAGADH, THE ONE WHO DROVE AWAY VAASUDEV KRISHNA FROM MATHURA SAMRAAAT JARAAASANDH
!!!!! ON THE OTHER CORNER, THE CRUSHER OF ENEMIES, THE MAN WHO HAS THE STRENGTH OF 10,000 ELEPHANTS, THE SECOND PANDAV AND DEAR HUSBAND OF DRAUPADI AND HIDIMBAA, PANDUPUTRA "VRIKODAR" BHIIIM!!!!!! UNTILL TOMORROW, LLLETS GET READY TO RUMBLE!!!!

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#1098

@Anjana:I dont think Karna ever thought Dury to be asamarth or incapable of being a king.i am talking as per the epic here.He always beleived that Dury deserved the throne and fully supported him.Now whether this was right or wrong is everyone's own POV but the fact that karna thought Dury deserved the throne is as per the epic

The problem here is they have shown this StarKarna disapproving of StarDury himself at times and being bothered too much about dharma hence StarKarana knowing StarDury is kind of adharami and being bothered about it and still wanting him to be the king doesn't may be make sense.But as per the epic Karna really liked Dury and Dury likewise hence he totally supported his claim.

also as for the rangbhoomi StarArjuna was the real winner if samarth is to be measured as per that then Arjuna should be king not Yudi😆So i dont think any one is thinking about rangbhoomi while deciding samarth

Edited by Sabhayata - 11 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#1099

Originally posted by: mnx12

Going to Magadh with army is easily noticeable by the spys but why the army stopped in between, that is difficult to interprete. By the time they realise what is actually happening, Krishna has compleated his purpose. The main idea is to catch others unaware, an important quality for winning.

hmm but Krishna ji himself told Jarsandha in the end who Bheema was so not sure if catching unawares was the real startegy besides before marching the army out krishna ji would have known it will be noticeable by spies .If catching unawares was the main aim why did he march the army out in the first place why didnt they just go as Brahamins in the first place?

From what i understood is that Krishna ji thought that they would declare war on Magadh as long as there was no friendship between HP and Magadh but once he reaized that there is friendship now between Magadh and HP thanks to shakuni mama( i think the moment karna accepted to be a king again the friendship was sealed hence exactly at that moment krishnaji stopped the army) then IP as part of HP cant attack Magadh hence full blown battle is against the rules

personally they can go and fight but cant attack Magadh without HP's permission now.they were discussing something similar yesterday as well

Quote

smrth

@smrth

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#1100

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
Diala - exactly Dhrit is just Regent in place of Pandu... I don't get what makes Karna think Dury has suffered any injustice? He is not entitled by birth or samarth to the throne.

Dhritrashtra's grouse was invalid on his own ground. If he claimed birth priority- unjustly deprived in his case, then 'justly' speaking, the throne belongs to Bhishma and not his own father Vichitra V!...As Bhishma had abdicated in deference to Satyavati's line, then on learning from Vyas that the oncoming child would be blind, Satyavati herself had specifically asked for fitter ruler and another child. Bhishma- 'just' heir- had approved and carried out her wish, anointing Pandu as legal King. After which, succession belongs to his line. Dhrit was interim regent. Incidentally VV, Dhrit's father was younger prince too...

Quote

1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 ... 118

Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread #4/ DT's Nt pg 29 - Page 110

Related Topics

Explore Topics