Arjun-Draupadi - Page 9

Originally posted by: simplysappie

@Sabhyata di : agree with you di .. N love you esp for the last few lines ..

you are welcome yaar

This show has officially reached the height of stupidity today with Draupadi-Arjun meeting prior to the swayamvar. 🤓 From today it's official- sealed n formatted- this is no Mahabharat. Period !

Originally posted by: smrth

And what is so wrong in showing Arjun as Hero? For all practical purpose, Ved Vyas did indeed narrate him as single most important hero of his epic. Yes Krishna is most important as God incarnate. Alongside, Arjun is concurrent theme. Be it his exploit as Drona's pupil, Guru Dakshina, Draupadi Swayanwara, 12 years exploration and pushes, or war itself, and most important, as first recipient of Geeta, Arjun is central theme. Only Bhim parallels as second hero or his exploits. So what is actual distortion here? To show Draupadi contemplating his hero image prior to marriage? Actually there is a base. If there is a hint that Drupad had wanted Arjun as a most eligible Prince, then Draupadi must indeed be aware of him and her interest kindled. Coming to this adaption, why much more baseless distortion as Kunti's prior knowledge of Karna's existence or all that nonsense would go unnoticed and this relevant embellishment on Draupadi's probable inclination as 'blatant' distortions?...

discussion is not about whetehr arjun was a single hero or not.Discussion is about showing the non existent love story of arjun and draupadi.All distortions have been discussed and criticised even kunti's

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

i really dont know what max people want to see i can only say that atleast no one in my family was happy to see this may be other's are enjoying i can say

But more than that this epic is not a normal serial the makers have a moral resposibilty to show all characters and their relationship respectfully which they arent

Regarding your second part i really hope you are right i love pandavas and draupadi i wnat to enjoy their scenes but if they continue this distortion i wont be able to

Originally posted by: Bhavaani

There's no need for language like stupid and crap. Just because you don't like the current track doesn't mean you should offend people who might like it. And it's hardly much of a distortion compared to what's previously been shown on this show. They're attracted to each other...big deal. Kaun sa pahar toot ke gira hai?

the thing is now too many distortion are becoming dofficult to handle each and every track is now distorted .I am sure that some people are enjoying this track good for them i am happy for them.But some people arnet like i am a big fan of all pandavas and draupadi hence showing her relation with other pandavas with such disrespect is not acceptable to me may be its to others but personally to me its not.

Strange forum! Absolutely baseless conjectures like same Draupadi's probable attraction towards another character- Karna, was being written and discussed extensively just a few days back. Even advanced as almost unsaid truth citing some good literary works. Never mind, it's in direct contradiction to whatever Ved Vyas has written about the two- a clear distortion. But now, when something is going in tandem with what Ved Vyas has expressly explained in the end, it is being objected as 'distortion'..😕

Originally posted by: ashwinomathew

wud like to disagree here abt her partiality for arjun. Draupadi was partial towards him not coz she fell in luv wid him bfore d swayamvar but bcoz he had won her in d swayamvar.She looked upto him as her hero.It was when she was taken home n was asked to b shared dat she bcame wife to d other four brothers n Arjun was NOT in luv wid her.He had won her in d swayamvar n so had no qualms watsoever abt sharing her wid his brothers.But for Draupadi..Arjun was her first husband n so d partiality towards him.

Agreed! I did say it was a dramatisation of the exercpt.

@smrth:If they would have shown Karna and Drauapdi have feelings for each other it would have been equally crticised even more .Since most of us here love the epic and want things to be shown as per the epic.trust me most of us wont appreciate karna and drauapadi angle as well

Originally posted by: smrth

Strange forum! Absolutely baseless conjectures like same Draupadi's probable attraction towards another character- Karna, was being written and discussed extensively just a few days back. Even advanced as almost unsaid truth citing some good literary works. Never mind, it's in direct contradiction to whatever Ved Vyas has written about the two- a clear distortion. But now, when something is going in tandem with what Ved Vyas has expressly explained in the end, it is being objected as 'distortion'..😕

Thank you! 👏 This is exactly what I'm talking about

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

agree with first point

the secodn part is only yudi's POV Drauapdi never openely preffered one husband over the other ans there is no other incident in Mahabharat that indicates the same