if not Mahabharat, read History at least - Page 2

👏 Got to learn a lot from your post. Yes.. this is a flimsy, filmy stuff.. In Hindi movies, all tribals, Aadivaasis are made fun of and are shown to talk in gibberish and having gibberish customs and singing songs like 'Mombasa..' (I like C. Ramchandra by the way..) So looks like some new CV trying to show his hand at amateur creativity..

I thought rakshas were supposed to be mighty and scary but they all looked so funny today i mean i literally thought who can be scared of them.

Originally posted by: --MimiGupta--

It has been quite long that CVs are making masaladar daily soap demeaning the glory of an epic - a literature .. Today they murdered another thing i.e HISTORY and I am not talking about Mytho-History but pure history here

What the heck it was in the name of Hidimba-Bheem wedding. It looked some uncultured brute or foolish creature from some fairy tale are jumping and doing silly attributes making silly gesture n postures .. what a disgusting way to make mockery of something. You showed rakshas as some dull headed creatures .. who has no brain no education and laughing stalk to so called developed race.

Let me remind you RAKSHASH means Non-Aryan Natives of this country. A very developed clan as much as Aryans if not more. Check History Rakshash aka non Aryans were quite advance in cultural field along with architecture, science and by social measure. do Not forget Rakshas aka non Aryan natives who once established "Indus valley civilization" was acquainted with URBAN civilization what Aryans was not. They have been mocked tortured and demeaned for ages but what is this even in modern days you people portraying them with such mean ways.

You must think what message you are giving to the new gen watching it. By being the native of our country they should be respected as our ancestors but such dishonoring depiction is a shame of us that still entertainment world display them nothing but a dull headed brainless creature..

Nice post,Mimi di!

i think they tried to show how rakshasas were diff than aryan people n why aryans were called superior. may b many will (not us 😛 ) will ask what was the problem in marrying if they were also civilized people n how can they b called rakshasa.atleast my grandmother will have questioned this.though ur post is really interesting. i think it has been a trend that ralhas wear "ajeebogareen" dtesses n drink too much n have no boundations or rules.
i dont know abt bengali version. but in my place though vibhisan is called "ghar ka bhedi lanka dhaye"
he is still considered to be a dharmatma n quite knowledgable person. he is perceived as devotee of ram.so as per me that example was apt.

Originally posted by: srishtisingh

i think they tried to show how rakshasas were diff than aryan people n why aryans were called superior. may b many will (not us 😛 ) will ask what was the problem in marrying if they were also civilized people n how can they b called rakshasa.atleast my grandmother will have questioned this.though ur post is really interesting. i think it has been a trend that ralhas wear "ajeebogareen" dtesses n drink too much n have no boundations or rules.
i dont know abt bengali version. but in my place though vibhisan is called "ghar ka bhedi lanka dhaye"
he is still considered to be a dharmatma n quite knowledgable person. he is perceived as devotee of ram.so as per me that example was apt.

Originally posted by: srishtisingh

i think they went with common notion without giving it a thought.common notion of rakshasa is they are uncivilised people who look "darawana" .may b according to them n infee stories rakshasha are like this.who knows wat goes in cvs mind?

@mimi i dint mean he is not said "ghar ka bhedi" .but still he was considered very knowledgable person

Originally posted by: TheM5393