Posted:
Najat, thanks for the awesome pics and the clarifying on certain visual points at least so far.
Whatever blunders and lacks the CVs avoided as pitfalls in earlier tracks, they seem to be diligently covering in this ongoing track since the past few months and counting.
The problem seems to be a severe case of counting the chickens and a chicken farm before the very dubious starter eggs hatch - and the CVs are doing this consistently with every track.
They start with a rigmarole of sufferings and struggles, fail to show the person whose being down was used as the excuse actually himself triumphing, go against the basic concept of mass-sympathy and support going to the person who was down for that person's own struggle and triumphant rise, and end up inexplicably bewildered by lack of mass-support for someone else when they conveniently forget all the causative struggles and reasons and show someone else triumphant instead and the original causative sufferer having gained nothing that was used as excuse for convenience purpose.
Apparently they decided not to scrap Pabho as a screentime-filler just yet.
So is she to irritate us on daily basis by making adverse comments about Madhu, so that Madhu herself or someone else can give regular speeches about Madhu's being a most respectful bahu and devoted wife?
How the heck is any ploy expected to work when the CVs go to such trouble to have both leads fail to live upto their words very soon after saying the proclamation dialogues?
Would have much rather preferred Madhu tossing Pabho out or at least being catalyst in Pabho's departure, but wasn't sure they would since the character was apparently not gaining adverse mass-reaction merely to presence unlike some other supporting characters, merely disinterest for the solo-confrontation scenes of 'wicked saas tormenting devoted bahu' in the outrageous nivaaran sympathy-gambits.
So presumably, they won't dispense with Pabho until they have another option as filler for screentime.
Whatever blunders and lacks the CVs avoided as pitfalls in earlier tracks, they seem to be diligently covering in this ongoing track since the past few months and counting.
The problem seems to be a severe case of counting the chickens and a chicken farm before the very dubious starter eggs hatch - and the CVs are doing this consistently with every track.
They start with a rigmarole of sufferings and struggles, fail to show the person whose being down was used as the excuse actually himself triumphing, go against the basic concept of mass-sympathy and support going to the person who was down for that person's own struggle and triumphant rise, and end up inexplicably bewildered by lack of mass-support for someone else when they conveniently forget all the causative struggles and reasons and show someone else triumphant instead and the original causative sufferer having gained nothing that was used as excuse for convenience purpose.
Apparently they decided not to scrap Pabho as a screentime-filler just yet.
So is she to irritate us on daily basis by making adverse comments about Madhu, so that Madhu herself or someone else can give regular speeches about Madhu's being a most respectful bahu and devoted wife?
How the heck is any ploy expected to work when the CVs go to such trouble to have both leads fail to live upto their words very soon after saying the proclamation dialogues?
Would have much rather preferred Madhu tossing Pabho out or at least being catalyst in Pabho's departure, but wasn't sure they would since the character was apparently not gaining adverse mass-reaction merely to presence unlike some other supporting characters, merely disinterest for the solo-confrontation scenes of 'wicked saas tormenting devoted bahu' in the outrageous nivaaran sympathy-gambits.
So presumably, they won't dispense with Pabho until they have another option as filler for screentime.
