how can it makes RK illegitimate?? - Page 9

Originally posted by: Savz_uniqueblis

If sultan n rk r proved step bros,no one is illegitimate kids.acc. to law kids r legimate born in r out of wed lock.all this just for emotional drama in soaps.

That's bullcrap!!

Originally posted by: cardio21

That's bullcrap!!

There are many cases in real life where people cheat young women n their families and get married to them without disclosing their previous marital status..

There are was to protect such women and their offspring.. What the CVs are showing is utter crap.. This pc can prove that MJ's child might have been fathered by MK..

But RK is MK's socially acceptable and a legally wedded wife.. MK has accepted RK as his legal son before his death.. So all this illegitimate crap is bullshit...

Originally posted by: M.Hurr

I know one thing that RK's born from second wife to MK i.e radha ji,the thing is we dont know yet whether that marriage was registered or not and cvs are not that intelligent to give importance to all this if they can make rk illegitimate than any stupidity can be expected.

Originally posted by: _charu_

I was talking about worst case scenario..even if MK Meera marriage was for real, the second marriage stands void, even then RK is not the illegitimate son..it's not like Radha was MK's girlfriend and a child was born out of a wedlock ..MK and Radha's marriage was socially acceptable n RK cannot be called illegitimate under any condition..

Originally posted by: Poluk

As far as RK being illegitimate is concerned he is the one born within a socially valid marriage. A marriage done in a temple without two proper witnesses is not socially or legally acceptable. And there is only a photograph which says they exchanged garlands.

Do you know a person cannot be accused of bigamy unless it is proved that the wedding ritual was conducted with the full mantras, seven phere, sindoor and mangalsutra. In meera's case it is not possible to prove this. The Pandit & the two witnesses are also not there.

So the photo may prove that sultan is MK's son but doesnot prove RK illegitimate.

The media in order to titillate and sell always makes such headlines. But media headlines are neither court decrees nor acceptable anywhere.

It is impossible for Sultan to take from RK the status he was given by MK himself.

Originally posted by: Poluk

As far as RK being illegitimate is concerned he is the one born within a socially valid marriage. A marriage done in a temple without two proper witnesses is not socially or legally acceptable. And there is only a photograph which says they exchanged garlands.

Do you know a person cannot be accused of bigamy unless it is proved that the wedding ritual was conducted with the full mantras, seven phere, sindoor and mangalsutra. In meera's case it is not possible to prove this. The Pandit & the two witnesses are also not there.

So the photo may prove that sultan is MK's son but doesnot prove RK illegitimate.

The media in order to titillate and sell always makes such headlines. But media headlines are neither court decrees nor acceptable anywhere.

It is impossible for Sultan to take from RK the status he was given by MK himself.

Originally posted by: _charu_

until and unless a case of bigamy is filed by the first wife, the 2nd marriage cannot be termed "void" ..it's been 30 years and the accused is dead ! how on earth will Sultan prove his claims legally ? nor can he claim RK mansion ..and the wedding proofs or the kangan proves a relationship b/w MK and Meera, how does it prove that Sultan is MK's son? forget taking away, Sultan ne kiya kya aaj tak ? it's only bec. of Radha that the truth is out..

media doesn't have a role to play yaar..tomorrow they will print an apology note ...

Ahem ! m so late to reach here . Well Mallu I can't give u ur answer coz there isn't any 😆 From no angle RK can be called illegitimate . But here r some things I want to tell others .

Yes . It's TRUE that if a person marries 2nd time without divoring his/her first spouse the 2nd marriage doesn count . BUT BUT BUT !

1. In MK's case was the first marriage actually a VALID marriage ? According to Indian laws , a SECRET marriage in temple without at least THREE witnesses or any legal registration is NOT counted as a marriage . In order to marry someone either you have to inform the court that u r marrying him/her or have to inform at least THREE of ur frnds/relatives . A marriage which is done "Duniya se chipkar" & kept secret from society all along does NOT really count as marriage . Marriage is NOT just performing some rituals . You have to officially acknowledge that you married him/her , which MK never did for Meera .So from legal point of view MK-Meera weren't married ever ! That mean when MK married Radhaji from legal pov he was actually unmarried . Radhaji was his FIRST OFFICIAL , LEGAL , SOCIALLY ACCEPTED wife .

2. From Radhaji we got to know MK had a relation with Meera . Yes . Law will call that just a relation , NOT marriage , as they weren't legally married . & if Sultan or anybody wants to change the fact & want to prove their marriage as a legal one , either he has to show the legal registration certificate of the marriage or he has to bring 3 ppl who witnessed this marriage . Just an old photo where 2 ppl standing side by side in bridal outfits does NOT count as any proof . RK himself must have loads of such pics with the heroines of his films . That does NOT mean each of those heroines can claim she is RK's wife & Madhu is his najayez premika .

3. Not only MK-Meera's marriage is INVALID from legal pov , but also MK-Radha's marriage is a very much VALID one . Here some people questioned if MK-Radhaji's marriage was legally registered or not . Even if it wasn't still MK-Radhaji's marriage is a valid one . Because MK married Radha in front of whole world , acknowledged her as his wife in front of whole world , Society accepted her as MK's wife . So from no angle MK-Radhaji's marriage is on question . That was a clean legal marriage .