Originally posted by: zoya_naziya
I think it was different in the sense that every single member of the family including Rji never interfered in the hubby-wife spat, even when Dipali in her anger was insolent towards Sikky... Now who does that to a husband in front of the family?.. Dipali could have shut her mouth and taken Sikky inside the room and then taken him to task...So Sikky and Dipali are both to be blamed equally..
That said, I quite like the way the entire family behaves on such occasions.. They might be privy to the disagreements but they never taang adao in between and let the concerned parties sort it out... Even in the past Rji didn't interfere when Sikky found out about Dipzy's inclination towards RK and he threatened her to get a role in a movie...
And I didn't feel bad for Dipali even one bit... I think am way past that... Just my personal opinion..
Totally agree.
The whole family scene construct was MATURELY done.
Socha jaaye toh, both Rji and RK would have not thought Sikky had done too grave an error by not asking Dips for jewellery, because they are always witnesses to Dips always turning down all the efforts of Sikky. As mute witnesses even they had their fill and infact both mother and son were therefore on side of Sikky and were ready to lecture Dips when Sikky was away. Sometimes we want to help a person, when he really starts off by himself, and that was the case with Sikky and Rji and RK. RK just lectures Dips, but Rji as the mother took it forward. Earlier Sikky was under Kukku's guidance, later wanted Dips to help him with role, which Dips never helped though kept the promise and now Sikky finally took to himself.
We know its not going to be shown to us that Sikky really did something; as soon we are going to have a deluge of other story, but in essence, the progression for Sikky's occupational efforts today was achieved, the 25 lac and stealing jewellery track closed.
The CVs also answered our question on Kuku's absence. I wonder what he is doing abroad at this old age. ?!!!