Devil's Paradise #52 Can it all be a BIG FAT LIE? - Page 106

Originally posted by: Shahisthi

[

Now there is no more love form Madhu if we think logically.

The man she loves never exist ever.

Originally posted by: Manonids

Shahi ...I so wish that even if Madhu gets to know the reason, if its not revenge, she doesnt go back to him! She needs to shield her respect above all ...Being sensitive is good, but what if it makes you vulnerable to deplorable insulting events now and then !! ..Am I expecting too much from the makers ?? ..They have already projected worst side of a superstar, then can't they be a bit logical towards the victim!!Instead of shedding tears, can't she just put her foot down and refuses to be with him later.!!

Please Note: I am not comparing anyone here. Just presenting my views and if anyone doesn't understand, please ask to explain before bashing. You are free to attack my post but spare me.

I am not sure how many here has read Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita. Morally speaking, it's one disgusting book but for a reader of good literature, it's a master piece. The abstract: "Poet and pervert, Humbert Humbert becomes obsessed by twelve-year-old Lolita and seeks to possess her, first carnally and then artistically, out of love, to fix once for all the perilous magic of nymphets."

We all have our own set of wrong and rights and a different set of wrongs and rights for characters (seeing from the reaction here in the forum as we would not even in our dream like to experience the event of yesterday -- or expected to play out on Monday -- in real life). I, personally, don't have any set of wrong and rights when it comes to tales of fiction and the characters breathing in them. I am more interested in how the story is narrated and the words that the writer has weaved.

Coming back to Lolita, the character is a pervert and he remains a pervert throughout the 317 pages despite He being the narrator. He could very well have made the readers sympathize with him. He tries but never succeeds in evoking sympathy or empathy for himself.

That is where my problem lies with the writing of this daily show. Yes, my fault, I still hope to see a well written daily shows that don't start looking like a different show after a few months. If Monday was what was planned a month back, they should have given a hint via the character and prepared the viewer in advance. There should have been no lines written seeking forgiveness from Madhubala for what he did in the beginning.

I want to defend or explain the character of R.K but the writers have started making me feel, I was sitting at a poker table to watch this show. Madhubala and R.K are characters for me (and nowhere I see them as living beings) and I love watching them because the writers gave me plenty of reasons to love them together. Now, they show us public humiliation and not only add a much darker shade to R.K but also ask us to go back and paint the earlier scenes black. I don't mind the twisted twist or the completely evil R.K but why paint the beautiful image of their togetherness. They may give a valid reason but then the story has been blemished and a doubt will always linger from hereon.

Strange writing twist for the sake of what!

P.S: Lolita is one of my favourite reads because of the beauty of its language. Lolita's writer has written a master piece but nowhere he makes you feel, you are sitting at the poker table.

----

Posted this on the main forum. 😊

Originally posted by: _innocent_

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Ashi! Yesh do it please! Here on this forum, when we are complaining that a woman ought not to be humilated we are being branded as bashers and god knows what! so do the twitter thing pwease😆

</div><div>

I still hold my ground kill RK's character! The rest will fall in place by itself! END OF!!! Hope this was pretty straighforward and no bashing, am sure????????? But feel free to hit the report 😛</font>