Originally posted by: desiflavour101
thank you for making 1 topic.
honestly you cannot take sides in a situation like this. as a viewer, especially in a controversial storyline like this, you have to be neutral about it. Rather than just choosing a side because your favorite is a part of this, look at it neutrally.
what happened with eklavya is TRULY wrong. there is no doubt about it. (And I DO NOT like Akaashdeep Seigal). but if he turns negative rather than prove that he's innocent, he will be a weak character who needed circumstances to change him while characters like Tulsi, Nandani, Karan, and Mihir are positive despite all circumstances against them.
but what irritates me the most about is the way everyone is reacting towards KT and Nandani (members of IF and SN).
when there is proof against Eklavya (his ring and the fact that whenever KT has asked her God to help her figure out who is the rapist is there) why cannot they understand that? (IF Members).
its circumstancial evidence, no doubt. but understand it from KT's point of view.
She accused Eklavya, who knows better than her who raped her? IF she is saying its Eklavya, its her word against his, but again she's been the one whose raped. Nobody in SN (excluding N) nor in IF are understanding this.
As for Nandani, i think its pretty ridiculous the way whole SN has turned against her, thanks to Tripti and Mohini. Since when has Tripti and Mohini become the voice of reason and goodness for the family? Are they forgetting that this is the same Tripti who is against KT and who kicked Ganga out of the house?
I understand Damini's point of view as she has raised Eklavya and is traumatizing situation for her. And I gave kudos to her in Thurs episode for not believing that Nandani would brainwash KT for no reason especially since N has only done good for the viranis. Even now, her asking Nandani to leave is a sign of a traumatized mother.
But Tanya, no words for her, in fact less said the better. But I do like to know that would she say and how would she react if proved that Manthan is the rapist? WOuld she side with her son blindly or would she turn bad?
More, I don't understand what wrong Nandani has done?
She is supporting KT. First of all, she didn't even believe that the rapist was anyone from the family but Aryan came with the proof that it is someone from the Viranis. If she really did want to put all accusation on Eklavya, jumping the gun, wouldn't she have done it when Aryan mentioned that its someone from Viranis rather than denying it?
She wants to bring KT justice yet everyone is treating her as if she is the one who arranged KT's rape just to blame Eklavya 😆
Nandani only came back to SN for KT and is still staying for KT only. Nandani has no interest in coming back to Karan's life, despite being a mother to his child and still being married to him.
I admit, Nandani is still haunted by the person who raped her. But you have to understand her truama to understand why Ansh has still haunted her. She was married to a man who never gave her even 1 second of bliss, despite being so-called madly in love with her.
I have been to author's discussion forums where authors have said that they had no clue while writing a rape sequence could bring back the trauma of her readers who had been raped.
Because Nandani was always afraid of Ansh's evil genes going into Bhoomi, she killed Gujral before Bhoomi could be taken away.
When Bhoomi had found out who her father was and became mad, Karan had called Nandani and cried to her: Ansh won. Bhoomi has become him.
So this goes to show that although Nandani has given birth to Bhoomi, she is afraid of Bhoomi inheriting Ansh's evil genes (which she undoubtedly has).
Laksh reacted for the woman he loves, I don't blame the guy. The love of his life has been raped by the guy whom he looked up to, its natural that he will hate that guy and believe the woman he loves. If you love someone, you should trust them or else there is no love b/n u 2. Laksh has proved this.
I am not on any side, but I understand all situations from every angle. However, no one can deny that Nandani is wrongfully accused by family members for brainwashing KT when KT herself went to Nandani and Aryan that it is Eklavya who raped her.
As a fan of Nandani, I will always remain by her side because to me she has done no wrong and she will not intentionally hurt someone either. If KT is telling her that it is Eklavya (rewind back to couple of episodes) then its natural for Nandani to stick up for KT.
And the ones against her, will again be proven wrong as they were last time when they had started back-lashing at her for marrying Aseem and not caring about Karan.
articles have revealed that eklavya will be accused and it will cause him to change overnight, but members are forgetting that storylines in every serial is changed, especially when a hugely popular serial like kyunki's twist is revealed, it is changed over night.
fact of this is gujral's murder case. initially it was harsh who was supposed to have murdered gujral. but when the twist was leaked to mumbai mirror, the former Creative Head of Kyunki changed it and denied the news. and decided to make Nandani the killer, so KN can be separated for 20 years. i know this fact because of someone in Kyunki's cast itself.
anyway I just want to say that neither KT nor Nandani has caused any fights in SN. Manthan needs any excuse to get into a fight with Nakul and Laksh. They have always fought. Only difference between before and now is that Tripti and company have blamed KT and Nandani for all of this, how sad and pathetic.
in all of this, that if Mohini and Tripti have become the "good" bahus, then SN is only headed for disaster, despite Tulsi being in charge, because Mohini and Tripti only bring bad with them.
