* where was lakshya?
* where was lakshya?
* where was lakshya?
* where was lakshya?
* where was lakshya?
* was it lakshya? 😕
--- reasons to think it could be lakshya 🤢
* his absence, sudden and unaccountable.
* he's drugged - both by opium as well as kt's constant and tantalising physical closeness throughout the holi festivities.
* kt screaming lakshya's name after her full recognition of the face in front of her could swing either way: that it is lakshya or that she is screaming for his help.
* the whole flashback starting with the first lakshya-kt theme song and then ending with a shattered engagement photograph could be a twisted balaji way of showing the end of the innocence of the lakshya-kt relationship? 🤢
* the bloody religious sounding music during the bloody scene - a violation of the ram-sita story?
* the strongest reason to think that it could be lakshya:tulsi-baa as well as anyone in shantiniketan will not allow a marriage to a "rapist" happen, not after ansh. i don't believe that kt will accept marriage to her assaulter. i think that the only way kt gets married to anyone other than lakshya could be if it's lakshya who did this dastardly deed. so if that future non-lakshya marriage is true, then it's most likely lakshya is the assaulter, even if it's a "one-time mistake under influence". 🤢
(okay, i'm making myself feel very sick with this calm reasoning stance on accusing lakshya of assaulting kt. 🤢)
--- reasons to think it just couldn't be lakshya
* he could've gone searching for baa and fallen asleep in her room.
* he doesn't wear so much jewellry, those were not his hands. but this is a flimsy reason given the terrible inconsistency of the balaji writers.
* he's in love with kt. even if he's feeling sexually frustrated, he would not be harsh with kt. lakshya wouldn't be able to tolerate kt crying, nor would he shut her up so roughly, nor would he force her so cruelly. &nbs p; right? it wouldn't be rape, damnit, not for lakshya-the-lover.
for this reason, i don't think the assaulter is eklavya either, even if every finger on the assaulter's hand had rings like eklavya wears! no one in love rapes their beloved. no one.
nor could the deliberate actions of the assaulter be something that mayank, the mentally retarded boy, could do. i do think that physical lust is hormonal, and not from the brain. therefore, mayank could rape someone if he's physically developed enough. but a mentally retarded person would not be so calculated in their moves. this assaulter was sickeningly deliberate -- that did not appear to be the fumbling actions of a retarded person. don't you think? 😕
i despise drugs and i despise drugs being used as a reason for animal behaviour.
damnit, i hate having to take wonderful characters in a crappy, illogical, hysterical-drama show and make sense of what's happening to them, while fighting the twisted imaginations of their creators, in order to keep the sanity of the characters intact. can india-forums take over the copyrights for lakshya, kt, eklavya, etc? the balaji poopsters don't deserve them.
damnit. where's my old "10 reasons i hate this show" list? i think it grew to 20 reasons just with this one show. 😔
sorry. today's is not quite a "points to ponder" list, no? apologies.