KTLK FB/Twitter Updates #5 ||CLOSED - Page 22

Originally posted by: tiniaa

Kamleshji has impressed me. I am impressed. We were being judgemental,I feel.

Originally posted by: Libra

Sorry if I offend anybody. But this is just my opinion.

Kpji is a writer, and an extremely accomplished one at that. As a writer he knows how to spin stories, and circumstances, and people. And that is exactly what he is doing. He first gives us the answers, what ever they maybe, that he wants. When he sees that, a word or statement is particularly inflammatory and he is getting bombarded with hate mail and criticisms, he comes out with a statement, trying to diffuse the very negativity, he himself had been responsible for. He takes the focus away from his story or track and himself, and puts the blame on the people that have not been been able to answer, or for some reason cannot defend themselves.

So basically like his character Khushi is manipulating the whole Mathur household. Kpji is manipulating us.😳

Originally posted by: Sujatha.rao

Anjani Si

Mr Pandey.Aapne "all girls play with dolls" waali statement dekar humko asmanjas me daal diye.Hum to bachpan me sirf toy gun,toy car aur toy helicopter se khele hain.
Ab lag raha hai kahin bholenath ji ne galti to nahi kar di.

Kamlesh Pandey Please enlighten me, if girls do not play with dolls, what do they play with? I have often seen them playing with dolls, collecting dools even when they grow up. What is wrong with playing with dolls? I had used the word 'doll' in a symbolic way that they learn to take care with inanimate objects like toys and then graduate to taking care of living people when they grow up, looking after their father, mother, brother, husband, son. For me, right or wrong, a woman is 'taking care' embodied. She gives birth so only she values life more than anyone else. She knows how to protect life. She fights for life, she shelters life, she fees life. If it was in my hand, I would offer the entire world on a silver platter to women and tell them, please Ma'm, take care of this world because we men have failed miserably in doing so.You fans get offended so easily and often with such innocuous remarks and that I am beginning to eel that I should just shut up!

Kamlesh Pandey Maine ek general view istemal kiya. Jaroori nahi ki har ladaki aapki tarah toy gun our helicopter se khele. 'Doll' symbolic tha ki pehle laek inanimate object ki care karte-karte ladakiyan zinda logon ki care karna seekhti hain--father, brother, lover, husband, son,daughter. Care ya 'mothering' ladakiyon ka DNA hai(ye mera personal khayal hai, please offend mut jo jaiyega kyonki ladakiyan ab army mein bhi bharti ho rahi hain, chand par ja rahi hain, goli chalaa rahi hain). Isase please ye mut samajhiyega ki main aap mahialon ko stereotype kar rahaa hoon, main sirf apna ek khayal pesh kar rahaa hoon, bura lage to maaf kar dijiyega aur bhool jaiyega.

Kamlesh Pandey The reason why every girls is expected to play with dolls is because the poor, helpless kid is taught by us so-called intelligent parents to do that! We begin the discrimination between kids by first by gender and then the rest of the crap we call culture. We buy her dolls, she has no way to buy dolls. We buy guns for boys and dolls for girls and look what kind of world we have managed to create? Gun ladakiyon ke hath mein hoti to duniya mein itni ladaayiyan nahi hoti kyonki ladakiyan zindagi ko paida karti hain iss liye kisi ki jaan lene ke pehle dus baar sochengi ki kyon. Mard bewkoof hote hain, bina soche gun istemal karte hain, kar hi rahe hain. 5000 saal mein 15,000 ladaayiyan hum mardon ki bewkoofi ka saboot hain.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Kamlesh Pandey And now the truth. I have said it earlier also but you fans seem to have either missed it for forgotten it.Why Nidhi is not going to have a child anytime soon is simple--in cinema or television, if a young actress is playing lead heroine, a lover, or even a wife, she does not like to play a mother because she is afraid of being typecast as a mother which will not allow her the opportunity to play the romantic lead of an unmarried young girl in films and television. Kritika is hoping to get a break in the movies (and no one deserves it more than her)as a leading lady so according to her perception, it would not be a good career move to play a mother at this stage of her career. And she is right.If she had planned to act only in television, perhaps she could have agreed to play a mother. But unlike Smriti Irani and Sakshi Tanwar, she does not have plans to stick to only television, she wants to keep her options open for getting lead heroine roles in films. Smriti and Sakhsi had no ambition or they realized that they will never get the chance to play young, unmarried heroines in films, hence they agreed to play mothers and even grand mothers. Hence Sakshi could afford to play the mother of a 5-year old daughter in BALH because she is past her age of playing a young, unmarried, romantic lead heroine in a film.It is a curious phenomenon in our films that once an actress plays a mother, she will rarely if at all get a chance to play an unmarried(read virgin) girl.That is why most film actresses postpone getting married in real life, and even if they do get married, they postpone motherhood because they feel the audience does not find such women desirable(read 'attractive' and 'available') because in the stupid mind of the audience(of which we all are a part of), only an unmarried(read virgin) girl appears available(at least in dreams) and hence considered desirable. So that is the truth once and for all behind Nidhi not having a child anytime soon. Please read it and if possible, do not raise the question of Nidhi's motherhood unnecessarily.I do not know about the future, Kritika might change her mind. But that would he her decision, not mine. As a good actress who deserves to be in movies(I have said it in the media and would say it again) she has every right to avoid playing a mother in television and I support her decision. That is why I had to find an indirect way like Khushi to explore Nidhi's 'motherly' instincts. I have explained it earlier too to some posts but I guess you all missed it or forgot it.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Kamlesh Pandey And now the truth. I have said it earlier also but you fans seem to have either missed it for forgotten it.Why Nidhi is not going to have a child anytime soon is simple--in cinema or television, if a young actress is playing lead heroine, a lover, or even a wife, she does not like to play a mother because she is afraid of being typecast as a mother which will not allow her the opportunity to play the romantic lead of an unmarried young girl in films and television. Kritika is hoping to get a break in the movies (and no one deserves it more than her)as a leading lady so according to her perception, it would not be a good career move to play a mother at this stage of her career. And she is right.If she had planned to act only in television, perhaps she could have agreed to play a mother. But unlike Smriti Irani and Sakshi Tanwar, she does not have plans to stick to only television, she wants to keep her options open for getting lead heroine roles in films. Smriti and Sakhsi had no ambition or they realized that they will never get the chance to play young, unmarried heroines in films, hence they agreed to play mothers and even grand mothers. Hence Sakshi could afford to play the mother of a 5-year old daughter in BALH because she is past her age of playing a young, unmarried, romantic lead heroine in a film.It is a curious phenomenon in our films that once an actress plays a mother, she will rarely if at all get a chance to play an unmarried(read virgin) girl.That is why most film actresses postpone getting married in real life, and even if they do get married, they postpone motherhood because they feel the audience does not find such women desirable(read 'attractive' and 'available') because in the stupid mind of the audience(of which we all are a part of), only an unmarried(read virgin) girl appears available(at least in dreams) and hence considered desirable. So that is the truth once and for all behind Nidhi not having a child anytime soon. Please read it and if possible, do not raise the question of Nidhi's motherhood unnecessarily.I do not know about the future, Kritika might change her mind. But that would he her decision, not mine. As a good actress who deserves to be in movies(I have said it in the media and would say it again) she has every right to avoid playing a mother in television and I support her decision. That is why I had to find an indirect way like Khushi to explore Nidhi's 'motherly' instincts. I have explained it earlier too to some posts but I guess you all missed it or forgot it.