KTLK FB/Twitter Updates #4||SK thanks all- 144 - Page 24

Originally posted by: jayanti_dj

I think this means the story isnt gng amar prem way !

PS .. would i sound mad if i say Iam a anti gandhian?

Originally posted by: debaparna77

Itna sure kaise 😕

btw, even m a anti gandhian 😉

Originally posted by: jayanti_dj

coz see.. from KPs point of view ..wat ashu had done for mallu d 1st time was coz she was his soul mate (watever that means !) ..and now wat he is doing is coz of humanity /emotional surrogacy .. and in both the cases ,it was his (ashu's) goodness that he tolerated evil... so more or less ashu has been mahaan so far (in his eyes atleast !) ...

and in today's statement .. goodness equates to mother teresa and gandhi ji ..and apparantly cv ji doesnt like mahaan people ...so guess for a change ,ashu would cease to be mahaan...and would not do wat is expected from him ( suffer in silence !)...

am not really sure wat i wrote made sense or not .. but this is the best way i could explain wat i think !

Originally posted by: mudraswathi

would you mind if i copy this and make a story out of it? 😉 😈
😈

En route to the airport. Crazy traffic but glad rains are here finally.

Originally posted by: koyelbasu

Quote:Deepa [coz see.. from KPs point of view ..wat ashu had done for mallu d 1st time was coz she was his soul mate (watever that means !) ..and now wat he is doing is coz of humanity /emotional surrogacy .. and in both the cases ,it was his (ashu's) goodness that he tolerated evil... so more or less ashu has been mahaan so far (in his eyes atleast !) ...

and in today's statement .. goodness equates to mother teresa and gandhi ji ..and apparantly cv ji doesnt like mahaan people ...so guess for a change ,ashu would cease to be mahaan...and would not do wat is expected from him ( suffer in silence !)...

am not really sure wat i wrote made sense or not .. but this is the best way i could explain wat i think !]


@bold Achcha hae. That means apna haq jataega Nidhi par. Atleast samajhme toh aega kya chahta hae.😊

Originally posted by: koyelbasu

Kamlesh Pandey Of course it is possible, Sujata.It can be genuine passion because passion knows no guilt. His concern for Mallika is not out of any attraction for Mallika but a humane concern to look after a pregnant woman, and of course, vicariously fulfilling his desire to play a caring husband to a pregnant wife. Guilt comes when the man is cheating on his wife and having an affair.If Ashutosh was feeling guilty (which he was not, he was only feeling sensitive to Nidhi's reactions because of her back story with Mallika), then he would try to cover up his guilt with forced passion. It happens that when men are cheating on their wives, they become more passionate towards their wives to cover up their guilt. So all you married women watch out! If after years of marriage, you suddenly find your husband getting more passionate than necessary, wake up. He may be slipping away:) However, I also have another point of view which may be considered immoral by conventional morality--if a married man genuinely falls in love with another woman(human race is biologically not monogamous) and the wife fails to understand that if she closes that window of her husband's love for another woman, she might be closing it for herself too, she could be more of a loser than her husband. Because when a husband is caught by the wife and retraces his steps back to fidelity to his wife, he may not be able to have the same intensity of love for his wife that he had earlier because the wife had closed the window through which love was blowing in. If the window of love is closed for one person, it is closed for another person too.Love knows no wives, fidelity or marriage vows. It enters a window arbitrarily on its own accord.I had written in some film that love is not an electric fan to be switched on and off at your convenience or will, it is like a wild wind from the forest--you never know when and from which direction it will blow and towards which direction it will blow. You do not fall in love, love falls in you.This does not mean I am promoting bigamy, I am simply stating a fact from a man's point of view. Hope you people do not mind.

Sujatha Rao Indu...I totally agree with you on this...their union is a reaffirmation of their love and her acceptance of him...there is no confusion on that...and I agree that having a child is also part of the process of acceptance and reaffirmation...her denying it even temporarily has left him with insecurities, even if he won't accept it openly...!

Kamlesh Pandey My feelings too! Now more and more of you are stealing my thoughts! May the tribe increase!