KTLK FB/ Twitter Updates # 2|CLOSED - Page 100

Originally posted by: Sujatha.rao

Let KP bhaiyyaji not do injustice to the genius of Valmiki and the moral dilemmas of his characters by comparing them to shallow characters that inhabit the sleazy world of saas-bahu drama!

Originally posted by: achiever

Did KPji forget thn tht bcoz Ram was flawed, Sita decided to abondon him for her own honor! Time and again its discerned tht Sita was bechari wer as Sita has emerged as a woman honoring her self-respect even while fullfilling her part as a dutiful and loving wife weras it was Ram who had failed his duties as a husband! Sita after living in exile with her kids away from him for so many years had chose to bury in earth rather thn bethrone Ram again as his wife! Did he made his Nidhi act as Sita if he thot his Ashu acted as Ram?

Also Did KPji forget tht Ram had repented his misdeed with his wife bitterly? has he even read Ramayana carefully? Did he forget tht his luv for wife was unmatched but tht his duty as a king was above all for him.. wat did his Ashu have to keep it against his wife? A blind trust on the most distrustful friend who had herself confessed her crimes right on his face time and again!!! Huh!

The amount of respect Ram had for Sita is not even iota of wat Ashu has for his wife! It shud b clear here tht Ram never suspected Sita..bt he was bound by his "maryada purushottam" image tht made him do this.. he was to set an example of a righteous man and more importantly a king! while ppl had right to suspect Sita and make her go thru ageepariksha.. if Ram wasnt Raja, Sita wudnt' have had to give Agneepariksha. the husband Ram never dbted his wife.. KP's mere quote of certain verse does not suggest wat Ram thot abt his wife. thy wer words of a king .. bt Ram's deeds and his repent and wait for his wife suggests how much he had loved Sita.. wen he was at liberty to have 100s of wives after Sita.. he had always remained loyal to her.. Ram abondoned Sita for his duties as a Raja Y did Ashu do tht?

Ramayana or its characters cannot b compared with KTLK or Ashu-Nidhi.. its msg is totally different.. here KTLK is a contemprory story dealing essentially with husband-wife r'ship and not some king-queen bound by their duties..

Y Ashu cud not trust his wife and trust his distrustful friend is beyond any logic! Sorry KPji!

Agree Ashu is no Ram and can never b Ram! Coz.. Nidhi is no Sita! U havent let Nidhi b Sita to make Ashu..Ram!

And KPji better not compare Ashu with Krishna.. Rukmini with Nidhi and Mallu with Radha! 😡! or the hell will break loose!😆

Originally posted by: SHIKHA19

so if acc to kp ji ram was wrong then kp ji is repeating same mistake by showing ashutosh in same manner a husband who never cares for his wife but expected her to be perfect ...

n i m wondering what will happen if ashu will know about rohan's letter ...then nidhi will be thrown out of the house in pregnant state like seeta ? n she will also need to give agnipariksha 😕

Kp ji if we like to watch ramayan ..we can watch it on youtube ..plz show us REAL LIFE STORY OF NORMAL PEOPLE . thanks for ur gyaan but not needed .

Originally posted by: achiever

Word! Ashu has become so shallow tht i dont even think seriously abt him! and Nidhi.. the woman Sita represents is no where near her!

KPji do not insult Ramayana or its characters by comparing it to ur shallow story! puhlease!

Originally posted by: deepa_jd

my hands are itchin ..to join FB ... thats where d gr8 mr writer resides ..isnt it..

hamare mann me sawal uchal rahe hain.. machal rahe hain !

iam in a moral dilemma now !

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Kamlesh Pandey

The entire nation worships Ram, and Ram not only forced his wife Seeta to go through the fire test(what a strange idea that fire can judge a woman's fidelity! Fire burns, damn it, whether you are Ram, Ravan, or Seeta) to prove her fidelity but even after the fire test, he expelled pregnant Seeta to live in the forest on her own! Today, if any man emulates Ram and expels his pregnant wife into the forest, the society will be up in arms against him, he would be taken to court,, but people worship Ram!Seeta had chosen to go with Ram when he was exiled, but when Seeta was exiled, Ram chose not to go with her. He chose the throne of Ayodhya over Seeta, his dear wife.If he was such a loving husband, he could have easily let Laxman, Bharat and Shatrughn take care of Ayodhya and accompanied Seeta into the jungle. But he did not. I do not know if you have read the 'Valmiki Ramayana', the one that precedes Tulsi Das's 'Ram Charit Manas' and considered more believable. After Ram kills Ravan and Seeta is brought to him, he addresses Seeta in words any woman would have found offensive. He says, and I quote, 'Woman!(notice, not 'Dear Seeta or 'My Darling Seeta', of 'My Wife Seeta',but 'Woman!') Do not think that I fought Ravan for your sake, I fought Ravan for the honor of my family('kul ki maryada ke liye Ravan se yuddh kiya!'). And the whole world, specially you women, find Ram an ideal husband, worship him. And my poor Ashutosh who unwittingly, if wrongly, let Mallika play her tricks because of his loyalty to her as a friend, is cast as an insensitive husband? Before you cast a stone at my Ashutosh, please look at your Ram carefully.I have nothing against Ram. I like him as a character in a great epic. I like him because he always stays within his character, his 'maryada', whether he is right or wrong. I like him for his uprightness and inherent goodness. But when it comes to his wife Seeta, I have many unanswered questions. I cannot agree with what he did to Seeta. If Ramayana was a daily soap written by Valmiki and I was a fan like you people, I would be writing to Valmiki about Ram the same way you have been writing to me about Ashutosh:)