*Another Blooper*

remember the episode where kavya pretends to have a headache to get anjali attention? well in it, kavya signs a few papers and checks for his mother afterwards and anjali questions him about it and says that there should be a record of how much money nitya withdraws and kavya's response is why? who will question her about it? and anyways, our company isn't a public limited firm where we would have shareholders to answer to. so my question is, where did these shareholders come from all of a sudden- just for convenience sake?

i wish the writers in india cared enough to remember details!

kajal

hun, is it possible that Nanda group of companies is a PLC but that the Nanda's themselves hold the majority share? 😊 im not sure how it works in India but if you owe over 2/3 of the shares in a company (in the uk) your not really answerable to anyone unless of course the rest of the shareholders decide to take action.. and only when the amount of money involved in the contract is high or if there is other cause for concern that the share holders are consulted, else pretty much is decided without a board meeting..or a resolution of any kind..😊 lastly even if they're not a PLC its more then likely that at times they have financial backers who have lent money in the form of debentures to the Nanda's thus they would be pretty much annoyed if they thought they wernt goin to get their money back...

oops sorry am deja vu of having company law lectures 😆

nope i didnt get a bit wat u just said. i was beyond me. i didnt even get wat the blooper is

ya same here i didnt get wut u were talkin abt srry.

is it the blooper or my v boring and long-winded post 😆 that u guys didnt get? 😊
its basically to do with the dynamics and technical make-up of companies.. i.e how they are run and where they get their money from..am off to bed now but am sure kajal will oblige and explain further 😊

oh uzi di
are u planning to be a teacher or are u already a one
what long lectures. 😡 just kidding 😆 😆 😆 hope u don't mind 😳 😳

Isita uzi di is not planning to be a teacher but a lawyer!she just wanted to let complication know that it's not a blooper it actually depends on the company (how it runs) 😃

no actually kavya just said that we have no shareholders because it's not a public limited firm, it's a family business and it's privatetly owned.

it was like, since we have no shareholders, we're not answerable to anyone.

and since when is ekta ever that technical?😕😆 they just added in the shareholders now cuz they needed them...
kajal

oh know i get the blooper, first they said they didnt have shareholders, n know magically there r shareholders.
uzi u'll becum a really sucessful lawyer.

😆 😆 😆 i didnt get it at first either but kitty made it more simpler so i got it 😛