Originally posted by: mistyeyed_25
Heer is trying to run away from prem coz thats the ONLY way she thinks she can give prem his happiness. This is what i guess love is all about.
ya, and i can't think
why she can't think of any other way. 'cause i do
not think that giving up is what love is about. i
hate saying this but: prem's what love is about. fighting for everything. fighting to have the cake and eat it too.
heer's reaction -- you put it well -- "coz thats the ONLY way she thinks she can give prem his happiness." that is
so wretchedly typical of the olden type of love-stories -- sacrifice, sacrifice, sacrifice yourself. but don't think about the consequences. bah!! there are both consequences of happiness. and a one-sided view of granting happiness is not what love is about, imho. 'cause we all know that love is a multi-faceted thing.
what she is coming across as doing really is weighing the two happinesses of prem, and
choosing for him that he can live with one. why does she get to choose that he gets one kind of happiness but not the other? what the heck. i so do
not agree with this.
but hey, what the heck. maybe it's just me.
Originally posted by: mistyeyed_25
but estee darling, this is what is happenning in India now days. Doesnt every father want his child to follow his steps, to fulfil his dreams he could never achieve? Lalu character is that of a typical patriach - one who just puts his demand on children expecting it to fulfil.
y'know? i already did some musing on this in an old bt,lt. i'd expect this attitude from a father who is either very poor or middle-class poor. or someone who is
extremely traditional and has never seen the world.
laluchacha does not fit either cases. he is very rich -- he doesn't
need his children to follow in his footsteps. he can have them do whatever their hearts desire. i'm amazed at the pervasive selfishness of laluchacha from the very beginning in his bullying attitude to his children's life.
and he has seen the world. he has spent the better part of the last decade and a half (?) in a rich, progressive society.
and i know that this is certainly not the kind of parental attitude in anyone that i've known in my life. in fact, my mom's constantly bemoaning the fact that parents give their children way too much freedom of choice on fundamental things like how much education they do, etc, today in our acquaintences. and these are not even that rich! parents kill themselves to give their children freedom, not prisons. they do prisons like "marry from our religion" or "our caste" still in india. but even there, the kind of inter-caste, inter-religion marriages today are
huge compared to the kind of freedoms people used to have some time ago.
at least, this is what i've seen and been shown. i haven't met a laluchacha. i may have met some kinds of lalichachi's -- women seem to be more stuck up on personal freedoms than men. and the chachi's insist on such restrictions for girls. never seen such restrictions for guys!

(

'cause of the way people treat us and them differently so often... grrrr)
Originally posted by: mistyeyed_25
This is the realism the show is trying to portray - a message alsio perhaps that whatever will be, will, the future is not ours to seen... que sera sera....or then as another friend rightly said.....waqt ke aage aur kismet ke peeche kuch nahin milta
y'know? totally agree with the "que sera sera". but laluchacha's choices and his behaviour is not real. i believe the second message. but the first "realism"? it ain't real! 😆
Edited by estee - 17 years ago