Originally posted by: .SNOWWHITE.
When every article said sources none of the article came in favour of Parth. I will still say there is no fire without smoke
Others may disagree.
I can't believe people would still make such comments when the entirety of the dark side/BLINDS has come out after the SSR defamation debacle! There's no smoke without fire. LOL, sure, based on that every other person involved in this show, including KP are bigger villains and vile people in real life. I can easily recall the amount of negative shit that's been spoken for KP before while he was leading another SP daily. Believe that, too.
RN, the desperation to somehow color Parth as the villain and cast blame is laughable. You want to blame someone for the mess that's KZK/PreRish right now? Blame the production. Blame Ekta! No, in fact. Go talk to someone in the creative team. And, if they really tell you the truth, you'll know where to cast your blames!
As far as these 'articles' and 'sources' are concerned. The moment a clip appears saying 'our sources claim' and says NOTHING DEFINITIVE, it becomes imperative that the audience understand that when they believe/endorse/conform/and share that 'indefinite/vague/source-less news, they too become part and parcel of a cycle that's inherently dark, toxic and unstable. Baaki, the negative PR that Parth gets has a solid, documented history. Maybe take out time, understand the entire picture, then make a comment.
And, no I'm not saying Parth is a saint with two wings clipped to his back. He's pretty flawed too. But if you think he can uproot the entire show, its entire team, AND EKTA, when HE IS THE ONE who has the most to loose, you've got to be kidding me! Ekta has far more leverage OVER Parth, than he does over Ekta. He wouldn't dream of sabotaging that. Not, after what he's been through. Not after he knows what he stands to loose. Baaki people can choose to believe what they want to. Funny thing is, they will never be able to 'prove' it. SO MORE SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE.