Posted:
no offence but y u guys are sayng angad snatch sur... he never told kripa to leave sur to him... it was kripa decision.. he only told her tat sur and his mom mean everyting to him.... so it was kripa fault leaving her daugther to angad.... and 2nd fault is she hiding parteek.... of course no man on earth want his kid away from him... i will blame kripa...
👏
very very very well said. why does everyone look over the fact that it was kripas decision to leave sur. if she wanted she could have took sur with her. as ive said before in another post, why would angad let kripa see sur after 5 years when kripa never even cared to go see sur after leaving the first time. she could've used her motherly right to see sur or to take her. it was her decision to cut off ties too. angad raised sur for those 5 years so he had every right to refuse kripa from seeing sur after 5 years. if not biological father, he did raise sur. if kripa did not care enough to look back then why now after 5 years? of course angad has every right over parteek too because he did not know parteek was their son. it was a truth that was hidden.
CID
