Hello to all,
May I prescribe a medicine that might settle our differences on Leach-e-Jalapeno cosummation? May I offer my interpretation of the actions that led to the dreadful night and after-consequences?
Will you be willing to give me a chance and actually care about what I have to say? Please!
Before I begin, I would like to say that for me Angad & Krips are equal as human beings. However, my 'way' of dealing with both characters is quite different.
I shed a tear every time Angad hurts; not a single tear rolls down my face when krips is put through a similar plight. I openly criticize Angad's actions; I understand krips' motivation as a woman and hence support her actions.
I don't necessarily support one over the other because I dearly hold onto 'right' vs. 'wrong' concept, but because I percieve Angad's actions directed towards me- I would never want a man to put me thru the torment Angad puts krips through. Hence, the staunch criticism. Nonetheless, it doesn't mean that I don't see Angad's misery and agony.
Now, that I have explained how I deal with the characters, I would like to talk about Angad in general: Angad is very impulsive in temperament and he leaves no stones unturned in getting back at people who have hurt him. In fact, in his hurt he destoys all- remember how he burned krips belongings, his sheets, and even krips image on the road. However, I saw a different man yesterday. I can't believe the extent to which krips' decision hurt him- he was willing to hurt himself to reduce the pain. His agony was well depicted. I truely symphatize with Angad's condition.
Now, I will ask you to put Angad and his agony aside.
Please do NOT read the following as a justification for krips' actions. I don't intend to because currently I can't blame one without blaming the other and vice-versa. I only use krips as an example to prove my point.
The following points have been touched upon by many over and over again.
1. P-K consummation isn't wrong, but why did krips deem it fit to call angad up right before she was going to consummate?
2. Krips is falling back on her principles, and giving her body upto a man who she will never love. If she truly believed in the words she was dishing out to prithvi, we wouldn't mind. However, her crying hints that she was regretful of her actions. To prove her point, she slept with prithvi.
3. Why did she consummate in Angad's bedroom? If she did, doesn't she have the decency to clean up after her?
Do you agree that the above points, along with krips motive, is the root of all evil? crux all problems? our differences?
If so, follow along....
Our differences arise from our perception - our interpretation of the situation. The sense of 'right' vs. 'wrong' is based on how we percieve a certain action and depends on if we have been an active or a passive participant in a particular situation.
Some of us take everything at face value, while others look for meaning behind every action. Some prefer to connect the dots. Others look at things the way they were shown. Pre-formed notions can form the crux of problems at times, too.
Ekta Mai & team have been successful in playing with the viewer's emotions & thinking process. They have been successful at presenting a situation which could have various interpretations. P-K consummation & Angad's rxn. seem so realistic. In fact, they have managed to showcase it as if it were presented in literature. We should commend ekta & team's efforts: literature - the ironies, the exaggeration, the artistic transpiring of events - and video - real people posing as characters - have come together in a powerful yet meaningful way.
To answer the above questions -I would like to put forth my interpretation of P-K consummation, and krips's actions. YOu do NOT have to agree with my perceptions. All I ask you is to take a look at the situation from a different angle. If you deem it fit or can manage to change your perspective, I would be more than happy; I have no problem in accepting rejections either. ARt is free to interpretation.
We can all point a finger at krips and label her actions as an act of vengence. However, I choose to think otherwise. It's quite true that she wanted to hurt angad to the maximum, but all her actions aren't to be judged on the basis of a single truth.
1. I see krips call to angad as a form of closure to angad-krips relationship for krips. Until now, she had been living a double life. Inspite of the fact that she was married to prithvi, she was living in past memories. The phone call was way for her to tell Angad & herself that all ties are severed.
She could have gone and confronted Angad on the matter, told him face-to-face that she was going to move ahead with life. Imagine the difficulty in doing so! I am sure angad wouldn't have done anything but hurl more taunts at her.
Hence, there is nothing wrong in calling Angad up. While krips and prithvi consummated, what is the gurantee that the phone was on? The director didn't seem it fit to focus on the phone even a single time. Hence, calling up angad wasn't as important as the p-k consummation itself. If the phone were on, don't you think angad would be on the other end. Instead, we was agonizing himself by beating the drums and imagining krips happily consummating her marriage with prithvi. Please connect the dots and don't focus on something that didn't even hold importance for the director/story-teller or the characters after the initial p-k talk.
2. Yes, krips slept with a man she respects like no other. To her, prithvi just might be the equivalent of God. Falling shot on principles? her principles are to care for others, especially her family. She gives her family importance...right now, prithvi and misti are it. I am not sure why you aren't willing to believe her words to prithvi. I am! She wants to move on with life- start afresh with prithvi. She said she had wanted to do it for months now. Does she want angad back? No! Then, why can't we believe that she wants to take a step forward.
ARe her tears decieving you? I percieve her tears as such: she was leaving her cherished past behind. she cut a part of her soul and heart away by consummating her marriage with prithvi. Agreed that her past wasn't all flowers, but she did hold it as hers. Now, she had decided to finally leave the past behind. Wouldnt' you hurt if you had to leave something of yours behind for good? The tears were cause she has burried angad and her memories for good by taking this step. Tears weren't for regret of what she had done or cause she had left her principles behind or she had been successful in hurting angad....they were there otherwise. Listen to the lyrics of KYph as she leaves angad's room.
3. Now, what is the big deal about consummating in Angad's bedroom? Agreed, this action only led to pouring hot oil & salt on angad's wounds (oouch). However, look at it from the story's perspective- Angad had insisted that prithvi stay at angad's place, while he stays away. Krips had already decided to consummate her marriage with prithvi...and she lands up at angad's place cause prithvi was there...they share a talk, and move on to next step. Obviously, they are gonna land up in the bedroom-Angad's bedroom, cause it's angad's damn house.
Cleaning up afterwards, yeah...that could have been done! I will give this a leeway..you know, it ended up giving us a darn good scene...and showed me a new man in angad.
What gives us the notion that all of it was "PRE-PLANNED"? KRipa "Planned" to consummate in Angad's bed! kripa "Planned" to take revenge...hence, all this. Why not otherwise? why not see it as her "planning" to save her marriage- to hold onto the man who had cared for her like no other? why?
I don't agree that "POINT" that meant to be proved by krips was "revenge", the point was "all ties broken, new paths set although with some agony".
So, you see....it's all a matter of my interpretation of the scenes. It's a matter of how you guys and I see it diffently. It might or might now have to do with woman vs. man. It might have to do with pre-formed notions.
It's a matter of me taking leaps and bounds to connect the pieces rather differently than you guys.
I hope you understand what I am saying...PERCEPTION...I dont' say this to change your opinions regarding a character.
I would be happier if all women see both characters in new light...and support both, especially female characters...you dont' have to agree with the actions, you can definitely try to understand the reason behind those actions...right?
Peception & interpretation is all that matters...the cause of all differences! Ekta mai....you are brilliant...I have never enjoyed video as a media similar to literature...(ok, once before, in 'black'..that was damn good attempt).
Thanks for reading through patiently...and maybe, I have succeeded in winning a few hearts for the woman, have I?
Love all and care for all inspite their faults.
*reepsđ
___________________________________________________________
Yes, you will be spared the torture of reading through my long posts. I won't be able to present my opinion...with nomi gone and no videos for me to feed off....and be happy, now! yayay for you, and ouch for me.
NOw, I will go and bury my head in books for good....for a week or so.