Was innocence lost?? - Page 2

yes show has lost its innocence because ak relation was ure and true

but kp relationis a mistake , comprmise and dhoka on both kp part

k did it just to teach angad a lesson

did'nt you see tears in her eyes when she left

why did she turn back to look at angad

she still loves him but is not admitting atleast our dude admits it

i think some new character has to be introduced in the serial who could help kripa understand her feelings

ALL K SOAPS ARE DUMB 🤢 😭

IT DOESNT HAPPEN IN REAL LIFE
I JUST SEE THIS SERIAL FOR FEW ACTORS WHO I JUST ADORE 😛 AND LIKE THEIR ACTING 😛 😉

Originally posted by: dadhich

hey guys...

People are saying that the shows innocence was lost today..Was it because Kripa and Pritvi slept together?? If soo then wasnt the show's innocence first lost when angad and kripa slept together even though they were not married?

Some one explain this to me😃

i totally agree with u

Originally posted by: dinky21

there was no innocense nway! 😆 😆 😆

Because she had relations with a man before marriage, even though she was in love with him? Hmmm....thats a different way of interpreting it. Because as I see it many people fall in that category...so they would ALL be branded "without innocence", na?

Originally posted by: Kismet_19

Because she had relations with a man before marriage, even though she was in love with him? Hmmm....thats a different way of interpreting it. Because as I see it many people fall in that category...so they would ALL be branded "without innocence", na?

Wow, a great statement made Naina ..👏👏

BTW talking of KYPH, Kripa is and will still be innocent in Angads eyes... as per me "INNOCENCE LIES IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER" and in this case the beholder is obviously Angad 😃

( PS : Not to forget the second beholder that is me 😃😉😳 )

Originally posted by: loonytunes

Hmm....I actually agree with Dinky. There was no innocence to begin with.

But yes, I agree with Phoenix Di too. The definition of innocence differs from person to person. In my opinion, innocence is when a simple hug or maybe a slight peck on the cheek would be enough to "fulfill a relationship". In my opinion, innocence would be when the first kiss a couple exchange would be at the altar. In my opinion, innocence would be to do what is right, morally and justly, simply because to you, there's no other way things can be done.

Innocence comes with purity and chastity. I'm not saying what Prithvi and Kripa did was wrong. They're husband and wife. But I do think that Angad and Kripa should have had control over their emotions. Pre-marital sex is something I'm afraid I don't agree with. Agreed, it might be a way of showing love but as I said before, it's not the physical relationship that should be required to "fulfill" a relationship. People are very unpredictabe and with time, feelings and emotions change. A little level-headedness is necessary.

SO according to me, Kripa was never innocent. But then again, that's just my opinion.

love,
LT

I think innocence comes from the heart. It has nothing to do with chastity, it is simply having a pure heart which shows no signs of guile or vindictive intentions. You cant define innocence or its criteria, everything in life gives you experience but as long as your intentions and motives are pure...for me the person will remain innocent. We categorize children as being innocent, as they are new in the world. We categorize someone who is naive as being innocenct (regardless of their age), and etc etc. There are so many forms of innocence.

We always claim it to be a "loss" of virginity, I myself do not believe in pre-martial sex but I also don't believe that by having sex you lose your innocence. Let me clarify that, when you give yourself to another human being COMPLETELY and without any guile then as I stated before that purity of your intentions still holds someone as being innocent in my eyes. And the way I see it, this is exactly what Kripa did, she didnt have affairs with Angad because he was a rock-star and she wanted something in return, she simply did it because she loved him with her heart, mind, body, and soul.

If you give without caring a naught of receiving, if you love without caring to be loved in return, if you are prepared to do anything without any expectations then for me you are still innocent.

But like you LT, this is all just my opinion and my take on the entire matter.

reeeps wrote: think the soap's innocence was lost way back...when the lovers decided to part ways and hurl insults at each other and hate each other like no other.

I agree wid reeps. I agree wid padma and LT too.

now that i think about it thats so true 👏

Originally posted by: loonytunes

And if you read carefully, I never once said that loss of virginity is equal to the loss of innocence. I was very careful about that because I myself do not believe in that. However, I DO believe that such an intimate relationship should only be shared with one person. Because as you yourself said, it means giving yourself up COMPLETELY to someone. Once you've done that once, you can't do it again can you? If you share that experience adn that relationship with more than one perosn, I DO think innocence is lost, and so is the purity of that relationship. [/quote]

Oh no! I didn't mean to imply you meant that in your post. I just meant that that is the stigma placed with virginity, and after you have sex the "loss" of it is focused upon more in society's eyes. The reason for that is something I cant ever discern. Let me say now, that I too believe that this relationship is something that should be shared with only one person, the person you love with all your heart and give yourself to, completely.

I just consider the fact that Kripa doesnt love Prithvi, she didnt have pre-martial relations with him. She again gave herself COMPLETELY to another man, but this time within the sanctity of marriage. P-K were married but not in the truest sense of the word, but by giving herself to her husband Kripa, in addition to giving him her complete trust, love and respect, also gave him her body. I just cant find her actions to be vindictive or full of guile, because I dont think she consummated her marriage for revenge. It was simply to try and make the one person happy who has always tried to make her happy.

To me that is different than having multiple bed partners for your own satisfaction. Their actions are for themselves, to please themselves. This consummation ended with a tear.

[quote]Kripa shared that physical relationship with Angad, and then Prithvi. The reason I support the relationship between Prithvi and Kripa is because they're married. Sounds conservative and old-fashioned? Well, maybe it is, maybe it isn't. However, having that relationship doesn't only mean a display of love. It can lead to a lot of other things. Pregnancy is one example of course. And a relationship before marriage always has a chance of breaking, more so than a marriage. When there's no real guarantee that the relationship will be there five years later, why take this huge step. Has a little self-control ever hurt anyone? Why is it absolutely necessary to take that giant step? Can it not be taken AFTER marriage?[/quote]

Exactly why I believe in waiting until marriage LT. I am not going to judge A-K's pre-martial affairs, because for them they were in love and thought they would be together forever. But you can't know the future so it is always best to think twice before you take such a rash life-altering decision. However that said, I don't think A-K's quest to give themselves to each other should signify a loss of innocence. They were still the same afterwards, mentally, the only thing that changed was their love for each other.

[quote]Perhaps, I am alittle too practical-minded. But that is how the real world is. I haev seen relationships break and mend with a snap. Pre-marital sex is an absolutely personal choice however so I don't think I haev any right tos peak for anyone else. Nor am I judging Kripa's character. All I can say is that sucha pure and chaste relationship should not be shared with multiple people, but only with one.[/quote]

Totally agree.

[quote]Having said that, Kismet, I do agree that there are only opinions on innocence, no definitions.

love,
LT

Ditto. LOL I better stop giving my input before someone else comes and takes up the metric trying to argue for the right of pre-martial affairs.