Page
of
1VANI KI BHOJ 9.1.26
🏏WPL 2026: Match 1: MIW vs RCBW at Navi Mumbai on 09/01/26🏏
JP Duttas Daughter Stands Up For Varun
O Romeo - Shahid Kapoor - VIDEO updated
KISKI BETII 10.1.26
Is Vani the next FL of Rishta Gen5?
The RajaSaab - Reviews And Box Office
Noina's toxicity, Mihir's ignorance😟
Family tree of KSBKT?
Congratulations to Kyunki
O Romeo teaser
The RajaSaab Part 2 Announced
🏏WPL 2026: Match 2: GGW vs UPWW at Navi Mumbai on 10/01/26🏏
Originally posted by: --Sanchu--
its just too early to talk about Love triangle...and why is it so very essential to start linking up two characters if it is shown the boy is helping the girl...
and as far as DEV and paakhi is concerned...not necessarily DEV will have to fall for paakhi, i mean he is concerned about paakhi and the family including Vaani, but that doesnt mean we have to tag Dev-Paakhi as a potential couple, it can be a relation simply based on concern.
honestly i would be happy if CVs actually think out of the box and not make Dev-paakhi a couple, and let their relation be a friendly one where Dev would motivate Paakhi to fight for justice and be a support to vaani.
Dev's character brings in a diversion from the high drama...and its very very welcome for the show...the character brings in a lot of positivity...and i earnestly hope the CVs would not marr that with the old tested formula of a love triangle same "nautanki" that would follow...
Originally posted by: rangeeni
Well said, the need for romance is unneccessary n dev wud make a stronger character if he becomes as people hv suggested a motivator or his resourcefulness mite help vaani get to where she wants, that is breaking down the strongholdthar r tyagi has on the city, but I do propose from my previous posts a development of a one-sided love regarding samar n paankhi as it wud certainly b unusual n not simply a repeat of other tv serials where as u hv said just because there is a boy n a girl n the boy is offering his help they have to fall in love n it can only be the good people who hv that priveledge. It wud b different if we had that angle of samar developing affection or feelings for paankhi, thus forcing him to reconsider his nasty ways n crimes n rebelliing against his dad who kept him like a dog, for me that wud create an interesting turn, although wat samar did was horrible to say the least n its still too early for him to change, I find myself sympathising with samar at times because he is under complete control by his dad, compared to sayali who manages to live by her own will though it proved disastrous. What interests me is seeing these negative characters showing their condition as humans, within all the badness that they r portrayed in