Average episode - Page 25

Originally posted by: elasingh

Jalal's changes into secularism are superficial ...they are more for political gains and less out of convictions...

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/jodha-akbar/3900469/doubts-and-discussions-about-historical-facts?pn=75

a post not chanting Akbar epitome of secularism only sharing accurate & unbaised history info

My dear Roshan it is given in books how Akbar was in chittor and it is such a blot on his image...and it is also true that except perhaps Sher shah Sur no other king has been so cruel ...and one more thing even after doing all this cruality Akbar did not really won the war...most of the territories remained with Udai Singh and Jallal had to fight Haldighati and even then Pratap later won back his most of the territories...It was only during Jahangir's period that mughal's tuely got chittor but only after giving Amar Singh more respect then all the rajputs even Ameri's...and no daughter of chittor was ever traded like BM traded Jodha...

Originally posted by: elasingh

Sandhya jalal attacked chittor for expansion and then ordered killing of civilians which was unjustified after the war was over and whatever the little territory he won..and why would not rajput oppose jalal? It is laughable that you expect them to bow down to him. .not every one is cheap and greedy like Ruku...and yes the rajput states you have mentioned , do you think history remembers them fondly?

and why do you expect jodha to support every war he fought? doesn't jodha has a mind of her own? doesn't she know that why jallu is going for the war?

she supported war with the raja of panna for sheltering the bhaagis. Now chittore too is. Why is the war objectionable to her now?

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

she supported war with the raja of panna for sheltering the bhaagis. Now chittore too is. Why is the war objectionable to her now?

the warriors of chittore were magnificent. That is why they are remembered at par with Akbar though they lost the war.

yes. killing of civilians is unjustified. But then war itself is unjustified. How did jodha know that civilians are going to be killed before jalal left for the war? because the solar system was giving colour indications? then how is sujamal's attack on mewar justified?

Ela, Jodha , supported MS in a war earlier as there was a reason to it. Here she was against it because of Jala's current state of his mind to what he was earlier. Now he is shown to be just Ruthless and in revenge mode. One of the reasons Akbar gave her was if God can take his innocent children, why cant he do the same. I was actually happy to see Jodha worrying for the Rajputs. Why should she not worry. Just because she is married to Akbar, she just has to stand by him and forget all about where she came from and her Clan. I can never do this so I was happy to see her also caring for her clan just as she was worried for Jalal.

Also she did not insult Jalal publicly, does she not have rights to worry about them Privately. That said, none of the Agrawasis were happy except one person who .was extremely pleased and proud, the one and only Ruks.

Suja mal did not attack civilians. ..but jalal did. .jodha knew that Jalal is holding his anger on her and will be very brutal in war.
This war was not going to be like Raja of Panna war and she also knew that mewar will fight tooth and nail with him. ..

Again this serial has been very kind to Jallu. .His reality is not shown. .EK do not have guts to show that Jalal will break those same statues of gods in chittor about whose equality he was preaching...

I dnt much about the history

Not at all. .no one can take away any of ur deeds. .if jalal's bad acts are to be remembered then also his good acts. .he has immense respect for his work but we should look at him with open eyes. .he has lots of grey too. .EK has not shown it

She is showing him cruel now

Yes he was in his initial years. .