best option for jalal

Akbar should give talaak to ruku and thrown her out of his kingdom, so that hindustan will never suffer by the hands of shah jahah and aurangzeb, east india company will never get permission to trade , there's is no ned for shivaji maharaj then, there would be only one ruler in the whole country, so that british could not apply his divide and rule policy, we will never became slave in the hands of british, nor british would have stole our golds, and we will remain called sone ki chidiya.
We would be the richest country in the world.

I am confused what does east india have to do with rukaiah?

Originally posted by: myviewprem

<font size="2">I am confused what does east india have to do with rukaiah? </font>

<font size="2"></font>

<font size="2">british would have anyway got in by arm twisting one or other situation </font>

<font size="2"></font>

<font size="2">shah jahan became orthodox because of nur jahan majorly </font>

<font size="2">he positioned himself as a pious defender of faith compared to ajehangir who believed in many religionsbe it islam, Hinduism, Jainism and Christianity at a time</font>

<font size="2">jehangir also projected himself as a orthodox defender of faith to get help to become emperor against support to khusrau his son. Its a different thing that as soon as he became emperor he gave up acting as an orthodox and followed multi religions again i.e. he came back to his natural self rather than continue acting orthodox </font>

Omg,

If rukaiya was not there then salim would never become the empereor, instead his son khusrao became. Jahagir was the one who have given permission for east india company to trade.
British have come behind them.

Whatever khurram was, is only because of pervarsih of RB. Childrens r like mitti ke gade, whateever u give shape they become just like, after it gets shape it canot be changed. It was shahjahah who had ordered to distroy temples and made masjit on that, it was him only who had distroyed all the rules made by his grandfather akbar which was made for the benefits of people. He hates is own biological mother, khurram was never with nur jahah. Its not just kiling his elder brother or cutting hands of people whom made tajmahal. There r many issues, nur jahah came very late in life of khuraam and for a very short time. It just the time before rukaiya died.

Now coming to british, after ending of mughal sultanate, all kingdoms became free, they started fiting with each other, and that weekness was captured by british, that's why use divide and rule policy to conquer India. It was impossible for britishers to conquer india if it was not divided in small kingdoms.

It was the goddess durga who had given her sword to shivaji maharaj toend the sultanate of mughal empire.

Why god had intervered? Because it was neccessary that. The year the aurangzeb sits on thrown; it was the same year for the birth of shivaji maharaj.

we cannot change all that has happened

Originally posted by: rima4ever

we cannot change all that has happened

Yaa dear, but kash we can change all that. Thts why I said this is the best option and all history gets changed.

Mahabharat gets started with the incidence of devvrath pratigya, he has sacrificed his life for the sake of his father happiness. But things r not judged like that. It is judge like giving one right to another, which is totaly wrong. There was satyavati who wants to became empress and want her child to became the future.

In mughal empire in place of satyavati it was rukaiya desires, khuraam was taken from the jagat singh gosain and given to rukaiya. That's the reason that pidi gets cursed. And the they have same end.

Originally posted by: Sweet24

Yaa dear, but kash we can change all that. Thts why I said this is the best option and all history gets changed.

Mahabharat gets started with the incidence of devvrath pratigya, he has sacrificed his life for the sake of his father happiness. But things r not judged like that. It is judge like giving one right to another, which is totaly wrong. There was satyavati who wants to became empress and want her child to became the future.

In mughal empire in place of satyavati it was rukaiya desires, khuraam was taken from the jagat singh gosain and given to rukaiya. That's the reason that pidi gets cursed. And the they have same end.

Originally posted by: Sweet24

Omg,

If rukaiya was not there then salim would never become the empereor, instead his son khusrao became. Jahagir was the one who have given permission for east india company to trade.
British have come behind them.

Whatever khurram was, is only because of pervarsih of RB. Childrens r like mitti ke gade, whateever u give shape they become just like, after it gets shape it canot be changed. It was shahjahah who had ordered to distroy temples and made masjit on that, it was him only who had distroyed all the rules made by his grandfather akbar which was made for the benefits of people. He hates is own biological mother, khurram was never with nur jahah. Its not just kiling his elder brother or cutting hands of people whom made tajmahal. There r many issues, nur jahah came very late in life of khuraam and for a very short time. It just the time before rukaiya died.

Now coming to british, after ending of mughal sultanate, all kingdoms became free, they started fiting with each other, and that weekness was captured by british, that's why use divide and rule policy to conquer India. It was impossible for britishers to conquer india if it was not divided in small kingdoms.

Originally posted by: Sweet24

Yaa dear, but kash we can change all that. Thts why I said this is the best option and all history gets changed.

Mahabharat gets started with the incidence of devvrath pratigya, he has sacrificed his life for the sake of his father happiness. But things r not judged like that. It is judge like giving one right to another, which is totaly wrong. There was satyavati who wants to became empress and want her child to became the future.

In mughal empire in place of satyavati it was rukaiya desires, khuraam was taken from the jagat singh gosain and given to rukaiya. That's the reason that pidi gets cursed. And the they have same end.

you are right but why Akbar took such a decision? is a big mystery

Can anyone answer me .. How come Jalal gave shah jahan 's parvarish to Ruks , as he knows separating mother & child is unacceptable.