Abhay like I said I dont know how to react...Wont deny that a part of me feels let down by Jo...and I find it difficult to understand that why she is just thinking about Ruku's happiness...why not child who is involved in all this? A part of me also understands Jodha and her desire to maintain Jallal's honour...But I wish instead of getting f/b's of Ruku in tarazu scenes she was getting f/b's of Jallu's humiliations...Originally posted by: history_geek
Here's my alternate thoughts on the present track...Posting here...
I am in agreement with Peepu and your views somewhat...BUT I think Jodha did NOT take the decision ONLY for Ruqs...There were 2 reasons in it -- 1. Ruqs Drama 2. Jalal's promise...That tarazu scene was to show Ruqs words tearing her...And Jalal's helplessness was ALREADY shown to Jodha in the DEk in previous episode...Hence, we were shown BOTH the scenarios in 2 episodes...
As for the Rajvanshi dialogue, i DO NOT hold the CV's responsible for this dialogue..Ab hamara show hi 2 communities ke bare mein hai, jismein se ek ke bare mein famous hai that, "They kept their word before ANYthing" (barring 1/2 exception) , then why won't the CV's use this dialogue.?. Ismein galat kya hai.?. I want to quote some EXCEPTIONAL Cases for Rajvanshi ladies where they kept promises BEFORE anything to PROVE my point...But your thread will be in trouble, coz "I" will make that comment..đ Sometimes i wish that someone should also translate their accounts from Persian and Sanskrit to English (like British did for Mughals) and make it available to GENERAL public, and then PERHAPS after reading them, we will understand the "meaning" of THIS dialogue...đ...Anyways, I did make a comment on this topic few months back...Ab nahi karunga...There are times when you are in DharmSankat of what to do, even if you are bound by Vachan, but that was the BANE of a promise..We all know of many promises otherwise also, where even after knowing the consequence, the promise had to be kept...THough, in present times, all this may appear acts of foolishness, but this was ONE Quality which brought Akbar close to Rajvanshis , for he kNEW what is the meaning of THEIR WORD/PROMISE...CV's can decrease the frequency of its use, but the dialogue is fine...
BTW, I am confused what to say, on the present track in context of Ja and Jo... Should Jo let Jalal getting sharmsaar before the ENTIRE Kingdom.?. She knows that this is the MAN who was ready to LEAVE his THRONE to keep his promise to her, that he will not allow her religion to be changed...So, was that time it was foolishness of Jalal.?. NO...It was NOT...It was HIS WORD, no matter how OTT it seemed that time...I thought i was watching Raja HarishChandra..đ...On similar lines, she understands this,...And she knows what is the meaning of ZUBAAN for Jalal ..!..
But i am fed up with Ruqayya...She is the MOST pampered character i have seen...Why she needs to be told that, she can not get a KID.?. Usko samaj nahi aata hai kya.?. đ Samaj sab aata hai BUT she loves her Auhda more than anything...And more than any feelings..!!.. Yesterday, i did NOT see any such Emotion or crave for not being able to be a mother in her...
About the Precap::
I will wait...I DO NOT want the intelligence of this MAN getting bowed down by the EVIL plans of Ruqayya...Ruqs ne Jodha ko USE kia hai Akbar ke khilaaf and i want NOW Jodha and Jalal to use the same strategy to counter Ruqs, maybe acting in tandem.?...
Also, Agar uska decision hai Kids nahi dene ka, then i want him to stick to his decisions...For any reason i do NOT want the decision to be changed...Overall, interesting situation hai, and i am waiting eagerly for the track to unfold...Ek taraf Zubaan Ka Sawaal hai to ek taraf Burai par Achai ki Jeet ka...Interesting na.?....Becoz again i do NOT want the Plans of Ruqs, demeaning BOTH Jo and Ja ki intelligence...BUT i have high hopes that there is SOMETHING more to the party...Ruqs ko KIDS nahi Milenge itna to main sure hun, provided CV's are NOT re-writing a MAJOR incident of history..!..đ¤˘
