Originally posted by: munnirony
i also liked jodha today. though she gave a bhashan in her confession as well, but still it was not like her previous lectures. but my prob is with the script writers. wht is right for a woman, should be right for a man as well. i can understand tht she is hurt & also why she left. but akhno mein dekhna chahiye was too much. why cant she express her feelings in a simple way. she could have said tht i wanted u to believe me, but u didnt it hurt me & thts why im leaving. but talking about marriages vows & all was like blaming jalal for evrything.
Exactly. ...the wordings of the letter were in bad taste. The part saying, had I loved another man... I would have done jauhar part was fine.
But couldn't it have been ...though I grina-ed you initially later as I told you it changed. Prem ka kamal or whatever had begun to bloom and you crushed it with your anger. What else but love would prompt a person to drink poison for another. But you mocked even that. In what action of mine thus far did you see me capable of zinakari. You had once accused me of adultery earlier, that you yourself proved wrong. But at that time you trusted me. But now you declare to have fallen in love with me. Why not the similar trust? My silence I agree was hurting you. But I wish you had trusted me a little more. I am not blaming you but perhaps bhagya is not my friend.
I felt angry and fought against your earlier accusation of adultery. But this time I feel hurt and broken and cannot bear it as I have fallen in love with you. Hence I leave.
Then...the don't send sena part... and wherever I am my prayers are there for you.
The vachan and hriday part of the letter sounded totally irrelevant and in fact strangely funny. The letter itself in most parts was incoherent and contradictory.
Edited by Sandhya.A - 11 years ago