why so less screen space of rajat! - Page 3

Originally posted by: albakry

I totally agree with you. The CVs and director have to do something about the show as its beginning to be boring and repetitive. Even Akdha scenes have lost their magic and charm. Can't they progress their love?

Originally posted by: albakry

But they are the lead actors and should have more screen space. In every episode MA, Ruqu and AK are getting more screen space than them

Originally posted by: aanchal_c

ppl r forgetting its a show in the 21st century abt a 16th century king and his life...there r very imp ppl there ,his hoard of wives,his special ministers who all play a very imp role in his life..so even if jalla and jodha r the leads they cannot occupy every frame of the show...the frames r done acc to the tracks...and when ppl say show is repetitive,do they expect jalal to play polo or play a video game in one scene...plz think what u guyz r asking for...i find it so ridiculous when pl say cv's r showing only one type of scenes when there were only certain sources of entertainment available...also the number of tracks our show has shown no other show has shown...these ppl only had wars,harem,darbars,political alliances...please keep that in mind before asking for varied scenes.

Originally posted by: mandyg

aanchal..u answer my on very simple question..giving the male lead a screen space of 4 minutes every day is justified and that too with no solo scene of his?

Originally posted by: mandyg

what love! they need to progress harem politics to make it another sbs! kajri badal track winded up in 4 days and this harem crap is still lingering on😡

Originally posted by: aanchal_c

why do u guyz keep forgetting that there r other characters besides jodha and jalal in the serial...even their progress is important.

Originally posted by: nabiii

anchal..i agree with u that every parallel character should b shown progression but amid these all that is most important to keep both main leads characterization n screen spaces consistancy always..after all they r main protagonists of JA..As example, see in yesterday episode,there was no need to show suspense scene b/w ruq n hushi, in this track already their roles have been flourished enough besides we all know adham-sharif's loggerheads so whats meaning to show their together argument scene cutting jalal's scene..if cvs wanted rather they could have shown how jalal is planning n teaching to his soldiers abt jaang, they could add his political, fun discussion with maan singh, mk..but reducing jalal scene n adding redundant vamps scenes over turn is decreasing the charm of episode..i already have felt in this track jalal isn't getting screen space that he deserves as a main male lead of JA even i m not also with creative team as there is no novelty in any scene..i distract n worry to think whats largely happening behind the curtain?

Originally posted by: aanchal_c

there r so so many days and episodes where the male and female leads get a lot of screen space,also jalal is a king,he is always surrounded by his men..so solo acts r kind of low..but that dosent mean that he is not getting importance...jahan jis track main uski jitni zaroorat hai utna hi toh role dikhayenge na.

Originally posted by: albakry

Kajri Badal track was among my favourite tracks. Akdha were united together as a couple. There was mutual respect and understanding. Even their love was progressing. Sadly they had to abruptly finish it. If one sees following episodes its like that track never happened, they are back to square one

Originally posted by: mandyg

what screen space are u talking about..i want to see his screen space if not less at least equal to the female lead and i want to see the balance in the episode..i am seeing this serial for akbar and for rajat if i do not see them then whats the point i am proving to myself by watching everything else except him..meri chor what about the viewers who are watching the show for rajat..unka kya..is he going to be treated as a side character from now on? jodha's character has never been treated like this then why his?