a bad representation! - Page 3

Yo peeps I can see people comparing JA with Qubool hai,iss pyaar ko..,saraswati and what not.

actually Jalal was just sitting next to her, he even didn't lean on her so that she had valid reason to think about that. Moreover they shared same bed , so what if Jalal sits next to her on her bed.. And it was she who's cheek on his hand not his hand was anywhere on Jodha..

Originally posted by: sunshine_sun

Her fear r very deep rooted u know. cvs r moulding her character like this..She is not stiff really..she gives good expressions..They both represent diff views...both have a long way to go...when she will fall in love with him she wont give stiff looks anymore. Both dont trust each other n its a fact n both showed it inthe previous epi..

You know how silly I am, I expected that jodha at least would ask Jalal to sleep on the bed seeing the stormy night and cold weather outside. But she has no care for him. Not an ounce...What's wrong in it if she would have asked him to sleep on the bed, they shared bed before, such a hypocrite cvs are making Jodha...😡

Well,agree with some parts...Jo was ridiculous yesterday and so was her behaviour with Jalal..but I doubt if any of it is Paridhi's fault,whatever close scenes they have had Ive liked her a lot.

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

She has done nothing to gain his trust.

and he has kept all his promises. There is a difference. He has taken huge risks for her. Letting her build temple inside and going to the temple.. putting his head down on Kaali Ma's feet.. it is all blasphemy in Islam and punishable by death and this is 16th century we are talking about. He has also given her sister the fort which meant a lot to him, not just emotionally but it was of political importance.

He is a man of his word and has far more strength in his character. He shows utmost respect to her in his way of talking and dealing with people. He gives his reasons in a very eloquent manner when jodha questions him. This makes her look like some ill mannered, uneducated woman on the street. She is demeaning herself.

yes u r very correct here..He did everything he cud to earn her trust n try to make her happy yet everything became futile bcz of trust issue...its a small word but a big thing. Jalal usk liye bahut saare gunaahyein v kiye h like saath pheres arti n above thing u mentioned😳...holi is a not big issue m a muslim my frnds put it on me but that doesnt mean i become Nepaak like theyy showed! ridiculous😡 i dont understand what happens wen she comes in front of her husband...she has taken him for granted really kavi daya aata h to kavi ghrina aata h..silly gal she is🥱😵 . But i think she cant be lovey dovey all of a sudden seeing him so close to him ..it will be awkward for us n them too😆. thats my point😊. usk l

Originally posted by: sunshine_sun

yes u r very correct here..He did everything he cud to earn her trust n try to make her happy yet everything became futile bcz of trust issue...its a small word but a big thing. Jalal usk liye bahut saare gunaahyein v kiye h like saath pheres arti n above thing u mentioned😳...holi is a not big issue m a muslim my frnds put it on me but that doesnt mean i become Nepaak like theyy showed! ridiculous😡 i dont understand what happens wen she comes in front of her husband...she has taken him for granted really kavi daya aata h to kavi ghrina aata h..silly gal she is🥱😵 . But i think she cant be lovey dovey all of a sudden seeing him so close to him ..it will be awkward for us n them too😆. thats my point😊. usk l

Originally posted by: happygolucky099

i agree jodha is annoying at times...

but you can't expect her to act love dovey with jalal

she bursted out becoz she found jalal close to her when she was sleeping .it was a justified reaction


but the freezing part in snow was annoying ...

i will not agree on saraswatichandra part that pari is not comfortable unless jodha has to act

romantic and pari could not do that..


till then we should not criticize her...



it is one thing to bash jodha but dragging pari is not justified..


thier offsreen chemistry is thier buisness we should not drag it on the story it has nothing to do
with it

i do not care what they do off screen but i want to feel the passion the spark when they r together in one frame, i do not feel it because i do not see the depth in paridhi's expressions when she is doing a close scene with rajat..i will not elaborate on this more since we have not got any of the real romantic scenes as yet, this was my POV, i really wish that she proves me wrong and creates the magic of love on screen with rajat!

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

16th century..

I grew up in the middle east and some Muslims are touchy about such issues..Not all of them. My friends landlord who was an Arab wouldn't let them put diyas on diwali so its understandable.

In Saudi, you cannot even hold a religios meeting inside your home..and show stuff that is associated with other religion publicly.. a hindu temple or a Church in Oman cannot look like one from outside.. Only inside..

The Mughals were modern in their thinking and celebrated hindu festivals because akbar had many hindu wives but it was behind closed doors.. there were conservatives in his court who did not approve of Akbar doing so

ya a group of section in every religion is very touchy abt such issus.. i was telling of my experiences..n i forgot 16th century😆

ok number one dont bring up barun or shanaya or any other couple name in here this is jodha akbar i agree that everyone has their own opinion but i disagree with you... your words seems to point out that paridhi is an actress and she is acting nobbdy else seemed to have a problem with the way things went down i fact most of the posts are postive about the seances today... idk i like the the way the show is going on...for me its getting better