Originally posted by: falak11mufc
Riddle me this:
A show is based on getting public votes.
The more public votes they get every week, the more money they make.
If say, Vineet was getting more votes, what sense would it make to a TV company, to get rid of him (who gets them a lot of votes and hence money every week) and rig results so that someone with less votes go through??
Reality shows are not rigged. It would make no financial sense to the TV company to rig them.
Yes, the deserved person does not win. But that is because the public votes for personalities they like / people from their region or cast / etc rather than based on musical talent.
But that does not mean they are rigged.
If Rahul won, it is because more people liked him and voted for him.
Bang on target here! I agree with each and every word you wrote up there.
I feel the producers, at times, do manipulate the public with dramabazi and nok-jhonk that is totally staged to work up a particular region or section for voting frenzy but that's where it all stops. At the end of the day, public votes decide the winner.
Eventhough Harshit is my favorite, I wouldn't say the show was rigged just because he did not win. God knows how many more conspiracy theories poeple will come up with😆