Judges and their paramenter of judging

we've seen enormous topics being created
on how unfair d judges were
so n so deserved full scores
so n so didnt deserve dat much etc etc
but have u ever realised wat kinds of allegations
ur putting on d judges??
i mean judges are there to judge the
contestants in each n every aspect frm voice quality
to sur to the harkats they take the correct notes
etc etc i mean each n everything
the judges are trained professionals who KNOW der
JOB..they know the thing inside out
dumthing might sound good to us just bcuz
v do not know all the technicalities but the judges surely do n they are bound to correct the contestants wen they go wrong
n if the judges point out a fault they WIll cut marks!

n as for us we have our particular favs n have a set opinion abt them even if they dnt sing up to d mark juss a little bit less laos thn we think dat they were juss awesum n deserved 10...but that "little bit less than perfect"
IS going to cost thm marks
many sd rahul deserved 30 fr his maa song ...
i say he didnt ...nt bcuz i dun lyk rahul ..i lyk him a lot
but go hear the original n thn compare fr urself did he REALLY deserve 10???
Judges are not deaf n they are nt goin to get any personal benifit be favoring sum1 or by ignoring sum1
we've gt to understand the parameter of der judging

shessh its bcumin as big as a novel😆😆 i'll quit now
but the sole reason fr dis post ws to make every1 realise that they arent being fair by putting allegations on d judges fr being biased ...!!!

we cant expect every1 to think lyk us ...

if i lyk blue dsnt mena the next person HAS to lyk blue but my lyking blue wont make it the most perfect color or d other persons NOT lyking blue wont make it ugly either..!!