VETO POWER AGAIN - BUT WHY??? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

2.3k

Users

12

Likes

29

Frequent Posters

752993 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#11
I am not sure what the format is for rest of the season and if from now on, only votes are counted for elimination. But from what I can see and smell, seems like a big ploy or manipulation for the Veto being used this week when Lauren isn't in the bottom yet.

Lauren has never been in bottom 3 considering good scores and votes. But going by the history and how manipulative colors is, seems like they wanna use the Veto power now then when Lauren is declared to be in the bottom on the verge of elimination. Using it now means, no more Veto for Lauren and she can be eliminated easily by freaking Rangeela channel. I admire Lauren or her dancing and I hope she goes all the way to the finals. But this is just the logic I can come up with for the lame use of Veto for someone like Mukti or Kids 🥱
Edited by CestMoi - 12 years ago
kaushikbasu thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: CestMoi

I am not sure what the format is for rest of the season and if from now on, only votes are counted for elimination. But from what I can see and smell, seems like a big ploy or manipulation for the Veto being used this week when Lauren isn't in the bottom yet.

Lauren has never been in bottom 3 considering good scores and votes. But going by the history and how manipulative colors is, seems like they wanna use the Veto power now then when Lauren is declared to be in the bottom on the verge of elimination. Using it now means, no more Veto for Lauren and she can be eliminated easily by freaking Rangeela channel. I admire Lauren or her dancing and I hope she goes all the way to the finals. But this is just the logic I can come up with for the lame use of Veto for someone like Mukti or Kids 🥱

Not sure but if it was for a face off and if face off still exists then Lauren would not be eliminated. Even her weakest performance would be better than I guess anyone.
Anurulz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#13
if they HAD to, i wud have preferred them to use the veto to save sana instead..but whatever happens in this show is upto the channel..which has lost its marbles..so why bother..
752993 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

Not sure but if it was for a face off and if face off still exists then Lauren would not be eliminated. Even her weakest performance would be better than I guess anyone.



Of course, that I know for sure. That's why I said I am not sure how they are going to go about the eliminations till finale. If it's face-off till the finale, then I am sure she will be there. if not, then let the drama unfold on it's own.

826374 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#15
i remember judges used their veto for isha last year , only one time , so that mean veto can only use for 1 time ,dont know y again

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".