What if the wildcards had been marked?

Needless to say, I am extremely disappointed with the judge's marking today. First things first, I am a totally neutral viewer and am not a diehard fan of any of the celebs especially as i see no point in me going crazy over people who i have never met winning a dance show that seems rigged anyway.

Anyways, back to the topic - after watching DD get 30 for just swaying around hanging on a pole and that being the only perfect score of the week, i am really doubting the scoring here. Meanwhile we have lauren with an equally good (if not better) concept with full on energy and dance and expressions to complete the act and this apparently can still be improved 😕 KVB last week did way more dancing with a beautiful concept in his barfi act and was told there wasnt enough dancing which i would have agreed with until today! I have no idea how just leaning on a pole then sitting on your knees is dancing?! and if anyone is going to say i am jealous - call me crazy but somehow i can live without having to hang from a pole with makeup that makes me look like a raccoon. I know the jealousy comment will come up beig a silent reader of the forum so just thought I would get it out of the way now.

So after seeing how the judges think, how would you predict the score of the performances of wild cards yesterday (fair scores) versus your thoughts on what the judges would probably have given (biased scoring)?

Sana- 29 (me) judges - 27 -- what an energetic and always smiling girl
Karan - 26 (me) judges - 26 -- remo would probably give 8 due to all of a sudden him
being fair and recognizing there wasnt much dance even though it was full of energy whereas other two would give 9
Mantra - 20 (me) judges - 26 (when have they ever given lower marks than that?)
Mukti- 30 (me) judges - 27 - loved that move where she spins on the floor and gets lifted by her leg and also the staircase walk was beautiful! i doubt she would have gotten 30 since that is reserved for just one contestant now :/