sandya’s attitude... - Page 2

^^^ Give the Wild Card a rest. It was SONY's decision to introduce the wild card and it was BBC's decision to approve of it. Whether its right or wrong, it is not Prachi's concern or Sudhaji's concern. Why SONY decided to bring in the Wild Card is their problem. People are giving Ekta way too much credit here. She is nothing when pitted against BBC. For Balaji yes she may be the high and mighty but not for BBC.

People are also very easily forgetting that till Prachi's elimation power voting was a big deal. It was only when she was eliminated that Synergy decided to take new measures and put a cap on it to 10 votes per phone as opposed to the 100 votes. Why SONY didn't open up the Wild Card to the other eliminated contestants was and is their concern. They have given their reasons why they only opened it up to Sudhaji and Prachi. And now if people are going to tell me that Sudhaji declined the offer based on a comment regarding the concept she made before the actual announcement of the Wild Card came out, then I'd like to ask if SONY knew of her decision because they surely went all out to promote her and asking the public to vote for her.

Why can't we all just appreciate the contestants, weakness and strenghts? Why are we all making personal judgments? We have our favorites and biaseness but does that need to translate into attacking a person's character, and that too people we don't know personally?

Forget it zero....According to them, they are the only smart ppl around. What if I have stopped watch KS for months, I like Prachi for what she is. Forget it Zero...they just need some or other reason to defame her.

ReemAshu, if getting what you deserve and taking the appreciation is not sucking up, then appreciating a boss for what she is, is not sucking up as well.

No one is in fool paradise. Only ppl who keep on telling others and telling themselves that others are supporting Prachi because of her Bani image are the ones in fools paradise. They are the ones who are drawing conclusions without any concrete evidence. Is there a poll or anyother facts to support what you say? No, then I guess it is not us who are in fools paradise.

Zero, according to some, judging others and telling that they are sucking up is not a personal judgement. Then I wonder what else is personal judgement. They are trying very hard to look smart with little success.

Well, it was Sony's decision to introduce the wild card, but it was Prachi's decision to go along with it ? Wasnt it ? I mean even Sudha was forced into it by contract obligations but said on national TV that she did not wanna come back and respected the format & people's verdict. As you yourself said, sony was asking votes for her and she was not and nor was she busy justifying her return.

Did you see anything like this from your fav ??? Did she even ever utter a word on the injustice done to the others ??? Did she not keep harping as to how deserving she was for the WC and how hard she worked blah blah ???

Also why have you not answered my question ? If you feel that Ekta has no hand in her re-entry by use of influence then why not sue the channels and the papers ?? Is integrity not important to them ? Or is it that they do not wana issue any statements or take any steps against this so that they dont open a pandora's box ?
I am not a rocket scientist but can see the obvious.
And boss, BBC has the format but the creative heads of Sony run the show, BBC is happy only with the money they get for the format, the other decisions are of the channel. What irritates me is that many of Prachi supporters are busy in justifying the bending of the rules, arre yaar khul ke cheating ki hain to bindaas Danke ki chot pe bolo na ' Haan ki hai aur jo ukhadna hai ukhad lo', automatically these topics will stop.

Why the hell should I direct you to the papers and channels, it is you who seek this information and so you can find it your self. All articles on Mumbai mirror, TOI and Mid-day have been posted here on the forum in the last 3-4 weeks. So please see them yourself.
For you the fact is only if it comes out of Mr.Basu's mouth well then as I said you can continue to be in the hypothetical world which you are in, I have no probs with that.
You remind me of the current Pravin Mahajan case or the Nithari killing case where everyone knows the criminal and the crime but yet their lawers want either the accused or deceased to come and admit it !

Sorry It was no personal statement, why are you taking it like that. Please dont.

Like you have said, that you are the one who is seeking the information ? And so you should go and find it, I have told you all the articles are already posted. And as far as the news goes, please note that I have no recordings of Aajtak & Star news etc to show you but I am sure of you watch these channels you will get to see it on some or the other channel.

Why do you expect that I will give you the links to the articles etc, if you seek something then make the effort. You dont get anything without seeking effort.

Unless you are the blue eyed girl of a very famous TV baroness, then and only then you can get something readymade (like the tittle of JDJ 2).

Originally posted by: ReemAnshu

Sorry It was no personal statement, why are you taking it like that. Please dont.

Like you have said, that you are the one who is seeking the information ? And so you should go and find it, I have told you all the articles are already posted. And as far as the news goes, please note that I have no recordings of Aajtak & Star news etc to show you but I am sure of you watch these channels you will get to see it on some or the other channel.

Why do you expect that I will give you the links to the articles etc, if you seek something then make the effort. You dont get anything without seeking effort.

Unless you are the blue eyed girl of a very famous TV baroness, then and only then you can get something readymade (like the tittle of JDJ 2).

😆😆😆 lolz u r smashing it😆🤣🤣

Zero, I assure you that I am not making personal comments on you. I am only defending what i feel is right. Sorry if you feel they are personal. The discussion can go on but I want to make it clear that I am not targeting you personally and have no intentions of hurting anyone. If you have any objections, let me know and I will edit them.

Now continue......

Originally posted by: piya_y116

😆😆😆 lolz u r smashing it😆🤣🤣

And unless you are judges favorite, perfect 60's are never your league.

i dont watch jhalak dikhlaa jaa much bcuz i get nach baliye at the same time .... so dont know about sandhyaz attitude but i think shez the best dancer outta them all ..

Originally posted by: cbcd_86

i dont watch jhalak dikhlaa jaa much bcuz i get nach baliye at the same time .... so dont know about sandhyaz attitude but i think shez the best dancer outta them all ..

Thanks, but yet if the best dancer gets good scores people have a problem. But when other nincompoohs get full marks for not even dancing, forgeting steps (Negi) or wasting time by Undressing/pole dancing and making lewd faces then thats okay. But someone who is giving pure un-adultrated dancing without any distractions and everyone feels that the dance was good so she has to get better marks.

If the donkey is scoring 27-29 then you have to give the peacock a 30 or else it will look like that the dancing abilities of a doneky are similar to the grace of a peacock. That cant happen, can it ?? And specially if 'Babul' is giving the marks.