They should have 100% judge decision.

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

lavish09

@lavish09

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#11

agree public voting should be banned. And judges should take a sensible decision. karan will surely not win if only judges decision is counted

Quote

prerna4rishav

@prerna4rishav

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 16 years ago

#12

Well I also feel that it should be based on Judge's decision...and if voting is an option, then it should be Worldwide....But JDJ doesnt have any of these two....it's kinda weird....

And for Karan n Parul fanz, they dance really well....so even if it's on Judge's marks basis, they have strong chances to win....👏👏

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Wrackspurt

@Wrackspurt

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 16 years ago

#13

I would have agreed with you if the judges were someone else...........but unfortunately i find that these judges have a tendency to get biased otherwise how on earth they gave good marks to Anand Raj in the first episode and also that how did Amarnath end up getting so many marks?

Quote

cutie_ketu

@cutie_ketu

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#14

i htink on some performances definately i was not satisfied wid d marks...but as far as karan's performance is concerned.....it was d best performance till date on jhalak.....nto coz i m his fan ....but karan's performance was really outstandin...

Quote

charmed_girl

@charmed_girl

Navigator

Posted: 16 years ago

#15

judges decision wud b gud cos dat way der person who performs better wil stay bt it wnt b as excitin cos dat way by jus lookin @ the performance we'd hv rough idea of who was better...n reality shos always wanna hv som dram n suspnse in it n dat way der wont b any

Quote

kabeeraspeaking

@kabeeraspeaking

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#16

Funny, here you can't rely on the Public or the Judges, because both will throw contestants in a ditch due to popularity and bias of/towards others.

Quote

Aleesha

@Karan1502

Explorer

Posted: 16 years ago

#17

i think dis pettern is nice...50 50....and itz nt unfair coz even hard kaur dint get votes frm janta bt she wz safe coz of judgs scoress...i lyk d way it is...and abt Karan after his first performance lotz of people said dat everybody ll gonna vote fr him coz of his popularity..accordin to me he wz nt dat bad... actully he wz good...bt common u cant say lyk dis after his second performance he got higest scores frm judges only,.,,he wz simply outstanding...and dis show is for us..the viewers...dey hav to do wat v want to c...lyk.lotzz of people are watchin dis show only coz of KARAN..including me,,,...

Quote

Sonam

@sonam_s

Dazzler

Posted: 16 years ago

#18

The three judges have been giving really bad marks to some of the contestants. Is Hard Kaur a better dancer than Monica and Parul? I clearly don't think so. 50%judges marks and 50% votes are a fab way.

Quote

sunaena

@sunaena

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#19

I feel 50-50 is perfect......And btw the dance off results are with the judges......so what r u finding so unfair ?

Quote

kashforlife

@kashforlife

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

#20

o first of all 'KA' umm what reality showt is based on judged votes only please tell me a few im curious becaus in india they all are on public, also in ENGLAND AND USA be it strictly come dancing, dancng with the stars, dancing on ice, x factor, american idol.... every single one

so your point is baseless. also if you don't like indian shows don watch them...simple. noone is forcing yu

and your comment on karan and ram, ummm they got the highest marks last wee s your kinf od CONTRADICTING yoursef when you say only judges mark should be couted and as if tht were too happen th people you mentioned would have stayed so please explain your theory onc again beacue you have clearly got something confused

Quote

1 2 3

They should have 100% judge decision. - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics