Dont Deserve To Win! Really??

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Nitya

@ChanandlerBong

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#71

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

I know what you are saying, but as you clearly mentioned, we shouldn't be using "what" for JDJ. There are so many unfair things which has happened on the show that I have now lost count.

Look at Top 4 and you'll get your answer.
Rashmi = excellent dancer but a WC
Rithvik = excellent dancer but a WC
Isha = non WC + excellent dancer but VETO
Gurmeet = non WC but not a good dancer

So for me JDJ = platform of unfairness

And thanks for understanding that JDJ is not about questioning, it is about blindly following 🤣🤣

What do u mean by VETO

I find everybody using the alien word 😕😆

Quote

smita

@music_masti

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

#72

WC...i dont think its not fair to call them WC contestants...

bcause it was channels decision to bring them that time...

and the contestants who was out before the entry of WC were not good to compete in the stage...if one of them has got a lil talent or votebank to compete against the rest...the channel shld have done that...

earlier in all the seasons of jdj they brought back the voted out contestants as WC...i feel it is unfair..bcose they are getting a second chance but not others...

but this time every one had equal chance...they dint bring back a voted out contestant..they started JDJ competition with the entry of WC's only...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

3283

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#73

Originally posted by: music_masti
WC...i dont think its not fair to call them WC contestants...

bcause it was channels decision to bring them that time...

and the contestants who was out before the entry of WC were not good to compete in the stage...if one of them has got a lil talent or votebank to compete against the rest...the channel shld have done that...

earlier in all the seasons of jdj they brought back the voted out contestants as WC...i feel it is unfair..bcose they are getting a second chance but not others...

but this time every one had equal chance...they dint bring back a voted out contestant..they started JDJ competition with the entry of WC's only...

I know what you mean. But from my perspective, I see them as having an advantage. I already had a debate about it with one of the other members. I was against WC and she was in favor of it. I can send you the link why I think it is non fair. You can read it and have some fun with it 😃 So I still stick to WC being an unfair addition, I know it is the format of the show, then so it VETO. Both have to be fair or unfair at the same time. But I like Rithvik and Rashmi, so my stand on WC is a bit shaky when it comes to these two, they are simply awesome, what to do 😛

Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 12 years ago

Quote

3283

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#74

Originally posted by: -niti-

What do u mean by VETO

I find everybody using the alien word 😕😆

Judges' veto power. I hope that's how it is spelled, so far I was never questioned on it 😆 So looks like you aren't from planet Earth 😆😆

P.S: For me I find WC a bit unfair. So if you wanna question me on it, please read my debate on WC, which I had with one of the other members 😃

Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 12 years ago

Quote

Nitya

@ChanandlerBong

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#75

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

Judges' veto power. I hope that's how it is spelled, so far I was never questioned on it 😆 So looks like you aren't from planet Earth 😆😆

P.S: For me I find WC a bit unfair. So if you wanna question me on it, please read my debate on WC, which I had with one of the other members 😃

Thanks for clarifying

Yeah i am not from planet earth 😉

Aasmaan se utri pari hoon ...I have descended from the hell 😈🤣

I find someone telling Huh or Doh

Quote

smita

@music_masti

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

#76

yeah...

there is unfair advantage for all as u say...

some will be in top just bcose of fans vote...some with judges partiality...and some with channels...

i'm only against giving second chances...in any competition i hate this second chances given to the contestants...

if it was in other compeition other than in tv do we get a second chance...if u r injured or u r out...(can nadal say to post pone the grandslams as he's injured...)(the olympic badminton committee dint give the chinese player a second chance to play for the bronze medal against saina)...

even aishwarya rai dint get a second chance to act in heroine movie..:)

if gia, shibani were out before the wild card entrants and when they come back as wild card i'll say its unfair..bcose they only got second chance...not others who are going out after that...

but in the case of this years wild card..every one had equal chance...

we all knew that talat, jayasurya, archana, jayathi and sushil were bottom and they had to go whatever the situation is...and we all dint want them to come back...:)

Quote

3283

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#77

Originally posted by: music_masti
yeah...

there is unfair advantage for all as u say...

some will be in top just bcose of fans vote...some with judges partiality...and some with channels...

i'm only against giving second chances...in any competition i hate this second chances given to the contestants...

if it was in other compeition other than in tv do we get a second chance...if u r injured or u r out...(can nadal say to post pone the grandslams as he's injured...)(the olympic badminton committee dint give the chinese player a second chance to play for the bronze medal against saina)...

even aishwarya rai dint get a second chance to act in heroine movie..:)

if gia, shibani were out before the wild card entrants and when they come back as wild card i'll say its unfair..bcose they only got second chance...not others who are going out after that...

but in the case of this years wild card..every one had equal chance...

we all knew that talat, jayasurya, archana, jayathi and sushil were bottom and they had to go whatever the situation is...and we all dint want them to come back...:)

The competition and examples you are using, are you telling me that they have WCs where they enter the competition few weeks before the finale. I highly doubt it. So you see both WCs and second chances don't work in any competition. So JDJ is definitely not the platform where justice will be served

But I know what you trying to say especially in terms of comparing the weak dancers to that of Rashmi and Rithvik. I can see how you are looking at it. You are saying such because you are clearly against second chances. While what I am basing on is clearly based on my views of WCs.
Since it is the subjectivity of our views, we have different outlooks.

For me either both, WC and Veto, format of the show are fair, or they are both unfair. You can justify WC being fair with your views, the same way I can justify second chances with mine.

It's simply the result of contrast viewpoints and what is more fair to one compared to another.

Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 12 years ago

Quote

3283

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#78

Originally posted by: -niti-

Thanks for clarifying

Yeah i am not from planet earth 😉

Aasmaan se utri pari hoon ...I have descended from the hell 😈🤣

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I find someone telling Huh or Doh

Wish all the contrast viewpoints can be discussed with such humor without other getting offended

Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 12 years ago

Quote

826374

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#79

Originally posted by: ana56

who r u to talk about a post that its rubbish ?

same like i have all rights to talk abot other things , i saw this from start of jdj , first u guys were cring over that people have some past prob with ur fev so they r bashing him , i dont know how much past garbage u guys have ...but now seeing u guys in this forum i can say im not surprised with ur past garbage 😆