Dancers V/s Non-dancer.

What do you think...

A trained dancer at any moment can show a good performance of the particular dance forms which they have learnt and their body suits and responds to particular dance forms they will excell as a dancer even if they have given 2 hours of time they can do wonders on stage... They can make u feel the dance... Because they are the masters in dance forms...where they know A to Z of dancin...


But think of a non-dancer, who has to learn the A of dancing and reach a Z of dance within one week and perform on stage and match up the choreographer and make his body and energy match up to the dance and song...

Just within a week of time they have to learn one dance form and compete with the dancers and survive the competition...?


I feel a non--dancer who spends only one week on each dance form and executes on stage and make you feel the dancing on stage stands taller than the dancer who is already being trained and their body is already adopted to dance...

So a non trained dancer should win the competition...provided they excell in final day of competition also...

Wow for a change, a good topic 😲

Well, for me I agree and disagree with you.
You see, when it comes to a stage like JDJ, everything can't be black and white. So I am basing my comments simply on dancing and ignoring the rest.

For me JDJ is a dancing show, so I look for good dancing and would like to see the person win who has performed the best, whether a dancer or a non dancer. I mean channels have chosen the contestants who aren't exactly at the same level, so I will just take what I get, put them on the same level of platform for judging and move on from there.

Even in real life, no one is ever going to be at the same level when they start competing at school, colleges, or work. Thus, some people excel while others fall behind, no one is going to say "Hey he is smarter than me or he is more fit than me or richer than me" Nobody cares, all it matters is whether you are good at what is being offered. So for me, once on a stage, it shouldn't matter what kinda background one is coming from, all it matters is how well someone performs. So I choose a dancer any day over a non dancer because for me that is what JDJ is aiming at.

Now once you start applying your own preference, views and bias, the above statement might not look like a complete picture. Like for me WCs don't stand at the same level, or that it is OK for Isha to be given two weeks off based on her consistency, or that voting ruins the chance of seeing a deserving candidate on the stage. Thus because of the subjectivity of the views, we see people with different outlook on who really is deserving.

So all in all I think my scale tilts more on seeing a dancer win. But it hasn't happened till now, so I am not even sure if I should be hopeful.

Edit: Forgot to mention, I believe that everyone works hard one way or other. One might have to work on expressions, while other might have to work on Stamina, the third might have to work on steps, the fourth on lip syncing, and so on and so fourth. So I believe it is very immature of some to undermine one's hard work, while applaud the other. And judging one's performance on something subjective like hard work is very puzzling.

Disclaimer: Simply my take on the topic.

I do agree with u at times I feel that it's not fair to have professional dancer in Jdj it's simply is not fair professional dancer's roji roti is dance so of course they r good at it but in Jdj they don't see it that way also Jdj is not just based on dancing it also involves popularity and everyone knows what they are getting themselves I think professional dancer is different from trained dancer on this show we have trained dancer professional Dancers and non dancers audience is also get cheated when they show professional dancers with others but it's about time we just watch it for entertainment only

very nice topic bhavya dear
i agree with u
but i wudnt comment on whether a dancer win or non-dancer
i just want this show to end

clear this doubt for me please...
i thought the show was about contest among couples with one celebrity pairing with a choreographer...
is it conditional that the celeb shud be a non dancer?
if not then why does the comparison of dancer VS nondancer appear in every other post?

Originally posted by: bangalores

clear this doubt for me please...
i thought the show was about contest among couples with one celebrity pairing with a choreographer...
is it conditional that the celeb shud be a non dancer?
if not then why does the comparison of dancer VS nondancer appear in every other post?

Because people simply want to justify their favorite's weakness when it comes to dancing, human tendency you see. As simple as that. It doesn't matter what the show is about, all it matters is how can one put their favorite on a pedestal while undermine others.