People keep saying Isha should be have been in the bottom two as she did not perform but wasn't she saved because of the votes?
I have noticed this in the past episodes too, votes take precedence over Judges scores - take any low scored performances - some of those contestants are still in the show - if it was 50% scores and 50% votes then technically speaking they should have been out already (including Isha, this week, as there was no veto given previous week). But Rashmi who has mostly always scored high and in the 25-30 range has always been in the bottom twođ. And Sushil, too, was in the show even when he scored the lowest and was Saved by the voting. How?
This leads me to believe that it's not 50-50, votes account for more than judges scores
Unless, they had added Week 12 and Week 13 scores (as there was no elimination in wk 13) and then did the 50% scores and 50% votes. It might make sense then (keyword being 'might'):
Week 12 + Week 13 (out of 120)
Gur: 53+55 = 108
Ish: 60+0 = 60
Bha: 48+48 = 96
Ras: 52+54 = 106
Kar: 48+56 = 104
Rit: 46+57 = 103
but if it was just Week 13 scores then it doesn'tđ because then Isha would have scored 0, at least in Week 12 she had 60 so that could have helped her when everything was combined together (example: Jayati's elimination over Sushil, Gia's elimination over Shibani and Karan, Shibani's elimination over Gurmeet and Karan, Darsheel's elimination over Bharti).
p.s. only used Rashmi and Isha as an example, this topic is NOT about Rashmi being in bottom two (previous episodes) or Isha not being in Bottom two. I am trying to make sense of the JDJ5 rules and how they are or aren't applied in practice
p.p.s. does anyone know where the JDJ5 rules are explained, as in offically?