History not gonna repeat this yr - Page 6

Originally posted by: HakkaBakka

I think both should have got 30. MJ should be judged based on dance while Prabhudeva should be judged on his dole-shole, cuteness, hottness.

That is a good advice indeed. But unfortunately Prabhudeva will be graced with problems for no fault of him :) but for some of his features like hottness,cuteness and dole-shole.

Originally posted by: Elvira22

Though i m not dere fan... But I real want Isha \ Salman to win ... thy r well deserved ... Remaining r oKkk ... thy r just beyon ... 👏👏👏

Originally posted by: --PiaSenGupta--

See if they are in the same platform ..andcompeting..then they all are in the same level .."just because one can dance well does not mean he/she will not get points" ...It should be purely based on DANCE

</div><div>

agree that if a trained dancer performs well then he shud b given deserved points and I have no problem with Isha getting 30 marks. She truely deserves it. Infact more than 30!!

And I also dont think that just bcoz someone is from a non-dancing background, he shud b given good marks!

But here GC and Bharti performed really well and it is not their fault that Isha is dancing really really well. Why shud goood performers' marks cut if someone else is beyond comparisons!! Judges especially Remo must have reasons for giving 30 to them. And I too feel they deserved 29/30.

It is just that judges shud not compare dancers' performances but shud give marks based on what they delivered on stage and shud not cut others marks bcoz someone is a splendid dancer!

Originally posted by: Ubiquitos

agree that if a trained dancer performs well then he shud b given deserved points and I have no problem with Isha getting 30 marks. She truely deserves it. Infact more than 30!!

And I also dont think that just bcoz someone is from a non-dancing background, he shud b given good marks!

But here GC and Bharti performed really well and it is not their fault that Isha is dancing really really well. Why shud goood performers' marks cut if someone else is beyond comparisons!! Judges especially Remo must have reasons for giving 30 to them. And I too feel they deserved 29/30.

It is just that judges shud not compare dancers' performances but shud give marks based on what they delivered on stage and shud not cut others marks bcoz someone is a splendid dancer!

Originally posted by: nishu786

Mostly agree with you...& last sentence in your above comments is the reason deserving candidate never won JDJ bcoz mark system is not fair,judges should judge purely on basis of dance,nothing else.

Yes Jhalak's main purpose is entertaining audience bringing celebities on a dance stage! And since celebs too have no problem with Jhalak system bcoz of their own reasons, none raises issues. It is not like their career depends much on Jhalak. If won well and good and if not then what; they are already celebs. So people too dont take it seriously bcoz they know they have come for dancing,have tried their hands and will indulge themselves in their respective fields which is their forte after going out.

If Isha wins,I will be happy but I want my fav. to give tough competition and maybe then win...well for my own reasons :). And if not then also all is well and justified :).

Originally posted by: Ubiquitos

Yes Jhalak's main purpose is entertaining audience bringing celebities on a dance stage! And since celebs too have no problem with Jhalak system bcoz of their own reasons, none raises issues. It is not like their career depends much on Jhalak. If won well and good and if not then what; they are already celebs. So people too dont take it seriously bcoz they know they have come for dancing,have tried their hands and will indulge themselves in their respective fields which is their forte after going out.

If Isha wins,I will be happy but I want my fav. to give tough competition and maybe then win...well for my own reasons :). And if not then also all is well and justified :).

Originally posted by: nishu786

you simply can't give same marks to best dancer of show & other dancers...

If your performance is not strong enough to challenge the best dancing pair,how you deserve same marks as them??

well I hope someone challanges best pair nd then gets 30. And I m not still in favour of comparisons in Jhalak. Ya they cud have given them 29 but 30 is too acceptable for me :). You are right from ur pt of POV and me from my POV :).

I just wish they will win the show!! I watched every season of Jhalak and I haven't seen that kind of performances ever in Jhalak stage!!!

Originally posted by: nishu786

If your fav or other contestant gives tough competition to Isha-Salman,then it's good for show...we will get to see some amazing performances,but so far,till today's episode,no other contestant's performance is good enuff to challenge Isha-Salman...

It's still early stage of show,so Let's hope,whoever continues to give amazing performance throughout the competition will win.

:). Waiting for upcoming weeks lets see how it all goes. Ya it will b really good for show if dancing level heightens. Hmm so far Darsheel,Shibani,Bharti and Gurmeet( later) have delivered well but not upto challenging Isha-Salman in dance, I agree :).
Lets see next week :).

Isha is no doubt good dancer but she has been trained in dancing for 6yrs and she used to be the best dancer there too..So it won't be fair enough for others who are non-trained dancers like darshel, gia , gurmeet etc..As far as I have heard gudges judge them how much work they put in, if they are trained dancers already not etc so I hope the results are fair too. 😊