just as we don't start to love someone we hate for any reason just on the basis of their good qualities alone ,flaws in our loved ones don't make us hate them instantly....
Completely agree, Minnie. No one is forcing anyone to love a character based solely on their good qualities. Quite the opposite. If I don't like someone, it does not mean that I must interpret all their actions as "evil" in order to defend my opinion about him or her. As long as I have reasons for not liking them and they remain valid, I have nothing to fear. My point is that sometimes we do not accept our own biases (which we are all entitled to) -- and instead cloak them as rightful indignation. And maybe sometimes we just don't have enough faith and conviction in our own point of view. Why must I be so insecure about my opinion that I feel compelled to interpret an act solely in such a way that it will validate my opinion - regardless of the way I truly feel about the act by itself.
It is ironic, but the whole point was that this character was too good to be acceptable (an argument that had some merit). So if in order to justify my dislike I explain how his actions are wrong, then I am in a way also implying that if he did not do wrong things then I would not hate him. In other words I am myself proving that for me to like someone they cannot be wrong. Yet my initial criticism was he is "too good to be true." I have now fallen into my own trap.
Isn't it just better to admit that I don't like a particular character for the reasons which I truly don't, rather than unnecessarily burden myself with the task of somehow finding explanations of every single behavior of his or her that will make those actions seem unacceptable? And then have the added burden of now either explaining away those same behaviors in other characters that I am sympathetic toward, or to defend my continued liking of such characters, without losing credibility? Why don't we just have some faith in our opinions instead?