Negative Atharv - Basis

This post is just to clarify one of the basis on which the possibility' of Atharv being negative is based, i.e., him acting as perfectly normal in certain scenes (no it isn't an acting glitch). I would suggest all you forumwasis to go back and watch Episode 160 - 15^th October, 2016 around time 13:59 for the clarification (sorry, don't know how to edit and upload this particular scene). It's a conversation between Sujatha and Ravish regarding Atharv's condition. Since everyone is obviously busy with real life I am just going to give you the dialogue:

"Kuch samajh mein nahi aata... Kabhi lagta hai ki bilkul thik ho gaya hai, toh kabhi ussi bachpaney mein laut jaata hai... Kabhi bahut khush reheta hai... toh kabhi ekdum dukhi... Mujhe toh bahut darr lagta hai, kisiko nahi pehechanta - mujhe bhi nahi. Kya ho raha hai, kya nahi... naa jane kab kya kar baithe... "

His being normal and going back to kiddish behavior has been there from the start of his mental illness. It is not recent... never has been. Let us not make it a new issue and think he is turning negative. If you want to come up with other possibilities/reasons of why he would be negative, except sudden normalcy, please feel free (avoid using this thread for the theories though - I happen to be a ViTharvian). Although would like to point out, it would be butchering of JNDSD to make any of the three negative, especially Atharv. His character has been positive from the start with a message - CVs would never turn him negative because it would defeat the purpose of the message. Food for thought.

Sorry if anybody has already pointed this out and this is a repeat.

Cheers! :)

Oh almost forgot:

#Peace

Originally posted by: BookWormV

This post is just to clarify one of the basis on which the possibility' of Atharv being negative is based, i.e., him acting as perfectly normal in certain scenes (no it isn't an acting glitch). I would suggest all you forumwasis to go back and watch Episode 160 - 15^th October, 2016 around time 13:59 for the clarification (sorry, don't know how to edit and upload this particular scene). It's a conversation between Sujatha and Ravish regarding Atharv's condition. Since everyone is obviously busy with real life I am just going to give you the dialogue:

"Kuch samajh mein nahi aata... Kabhi lagta hai ki bilkul thik ho gaya hai, toh kabhi ussi bachpaney mein laut jaata hai... Kabhi bahut khush reheta hai... toh kabhi ekdum dukhi... Mujhe toh bahut darr lagta hai, kisiko nahi pehechanta - mujhe bhi nahi. Kya ho raha hai, kya nahi... naa jane kab kya kar baithe... "

His being normal and going back to kiddish behavior has been there from the start of his mental illness. It is not recent... never has been. Let us not make it a new issue and think he is turning negative. If you want to come up with other possibilities/reasons of why he would be negative, except sudden normalcy, please feel free (avoid using this thread for the theories though - I happen to be a ViTharvian). Although would like to point out, it would be butchering of JNDSD to make any of the three negative, especially Atharv. His character has been positive from the start with a message - CVs would never turn him negative because it would defeat the purpose of the message. Food for thought.

Sorry if anybody has already pointed this out and this is a repeat.

Cheers! :)

Oh almost forgot:

#Peace

Originally posted by: BookWormV

@Reemz: I have expectations of people completely ignoring the main point and looking for a way around with magnifying glasses already ;) Coming up with theories is completely fine, but one thing is clear to me, neither Atharv nor Ravish are going to be negative. Period. Just because you want one ship to sail, it makes no sense coming up with theories which kill the show ka essence. (Although the current tracks are killing it slowly anyways - love story to crime thriller with detective mode on)

@cool_kriti: Naah! Would just prefer everything to be out in the open like it always is when Atharv Sujatha wants to say or prove something. ;)