Originally posted by: zainza
I think it was ok.Nothing was wrong or missing.Its just that we cant imagine Arnav doing something like giving a pearl necklace or a bottle with "I love you" message in it.These actions are sweet but actually Arnav has always been passionate and we expect passion when we see them together, but this was Khushi's imagination and she imagines him as sweet and loving compared to passionate and intense, therefore there was a difference.
Secondly, too many emotions were being reflected on Arnav's face, the ones Khushi wants to see: regret, guilt, pain, joy and love, which gave a huddled effect altogether and not the usual expressions we get from Arnav, wherein each fleeting emotion is expressed in detail and with perfection.In "jadu hai nasha hai" sequence Arnav was mesmerised and he found Khushi irresistable and at that moment those were the only emotions, there was no guilt, regret, joy and sorrow attached to it, so it was done in perfection.In "teri meri", it was the first realization/understanding of a deep and binding love,it was shown that way, Arnav and Khushi complimented each other, it was beautifully done, Arnav had to express that he was the man in her life, there for her when she needs him most, the man who cannot see his woman losing or dejected and that was what it was all about, other emotion were not attached and neither reflected.The kiss sequence was about desire and we saw a flirtatious, challenging Arnav, those expressions were perfect, they were not disturbed by any other underlying emotions.
Point is whenever we felt perfect chemistry were times when a particular emotion was depicted in utmost detail and perfection.Here it was a dream sequence in which Khushi conjured up Arnav having the feelings she expects him to have now: guilt, regret, sorrow, joy and love and all were fleetingly present, which gave the scene a disjointed feel.
Phew...I hope I was able to explain what I wanted to say...lol...apologies for such a long post but I wanted to do justice to the thread maker and my reply :)
320