Dharma Kshetra on Epic Channel - Page 30

Originally posted by: frappie

I cannot open the links di ...

yea in desirulz the links that say 'cloud' work

This episode was a welcome change after watching the long drawn out Drona episode and even the first part of Arjun's epi which dragged quite a bit with the unnecessary Mayasur bit.

The Bhisma part was ok though i would have liked Arjun to say that he was giving "dhand" to Bhisma also for looking on mutely when Panchali was being molested instead of helping him attain moksha!!
Karna seems so angry here too😆 though Arjun's replies forced him to kind of take a good look at himself and his deeds. But why Kunti had to open her mouth here i failed to understand!!

The best part was of course Keshav and Panchali accusing Arjun, though Keshav did most of the accusing and he did not pull his punches!! I just loved him for that. Especially when he point blank compared him to Bheem with Arjun coming out the loser!!
Arjun emoted quite well in that scene I must admit but Bheem looked a tad bit uncomfortable😊

I really liked Panchali's involuntary defense of Arjun...it was almost as though she could not bear to see him accused of anything here too...but there was so much angst hidden in her one comment to him when she said he could see her eyes which were always looking for him...
But she was truly Panchali when she said "a little too late" to Arjun and again his acting here was quite good.

And Chitragupt's verdict when he announced that you do not have the right to be called Panchali's husband any more ...it was epic indeed!! But i did feel sad for both of them...they both lost here😭

And next week's promo looks dhamakedhar...with Drau tearing into Yudhi and Kunti...am really looking forward to it


PS: Although i liked Arjun and Panchali's acting here, I feel SS and Pooja would have done an even more awesome job...

Originally posted by: ashne

He was acquitted of all other Arop's and held accountable only for Keshav/Drau's.

Then that was fair judgement somewat...Arjun has always been a dutiful brother n son...
His killing of Karna was wrong in manner but he had enough reasons to kill him.
His silent attitude towards Draupadi is probably the only thing that I dislike about him.
Although I believe he loved her...I feel in some cases, he was too silent. So the judgement was not bad but the divorce is pathetic...

Why was Arjun not accused of Khandavdahan?

And this Kunti seems to be a witch...Why is she so pro-Karna?
Never bothered to care for him when he was alive...now showering him with over-affection...Nonsense.

She accused Draupadi for rejecting Karna...accused Arjun for killing Karna...Seriously?
Who wrote the script?
I have always sympathized with Kunti for some reasons...but now I feel like shooting her...Atleast this version of her.

Originally posted by: amritat

Then that was fair judgement somewat...Arjun has always been a dutiful brother n son...
His killing of Karna was wrong in manner but he had enough reasons to kill him.
His silent attitude towards Draupadi is probably the only thing that I dislike about him.
Although I believe he loved her...I feel in some cases, he was too silent. So the judgement was not bad but the divorce is pathetic...

Why was Arjun not accused of Khandavdahan?

And this Kunti seems to be a witch...Why is she so pro-Karna?
Never bothered to care for him when he was alive...now showering him with over-affection...Nonsense.

She accused Draupadi for rejecting Karna...accused Arjun for killing Karna...Seriously?
Who wrote the script?
I have always sympathized with Kunti for some reasons...but now I feel like shooting her...Atleast this version of her.

Actually Amrita

Keshav says Arjun only loved her when he realized he would have to share. I am not sure, but he may have said, you didn't love her when you won her? You thought you will do so at your convenience and then you lost her to your brothers I don't know, does that mean he never loved her? 😕

Anyways, Keshav does say if Arjun had been a good Pati, the war wouldn't have happened. I guess because the division wouldn't have happened and VH wouldn't have happened.

And then Draupadi says no, when Arjjn asks for a second chance. I wonder what would have happened if she said yes?! Would he tell his brothers to back off? 😕

I wish they had stopped with Drau's answer. That was actually the believable answer of a woman who has had enough. Instead of the divorce thing I mean. That turned tragedy into farce!

this thread reminds me of so many old discussions😆

hello friends how are you guys?

will watch the episodes and then comment

Sabhayata!
Finally got here, huh? 😆

Yeah same old people, same old story, same old arguments! But isn't thrashing it out most of the fun 😆

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Sabhayata!
Finally got here, huh? 😆

Yeah same old people, same old story, same old arguments! But isn't thrashing it out most of the fun 😆

yup that is what got me here

old friends,old discussions old yet lovely memories

ok finally completed first episode on Draupadi

First i have to say bad set and bad costumes and not so good actors and bad direction as well

1)Krishna ji and Draupadi and the 'Saiyyam' word used here as well 😆

2)Karna and Draupadi fake angle here as well👎🏼 when will people get over this

3)OMG as per Dharma kshetra Karna actually did hit the fish's eye 😆 big big distortion and there was no need of this as well

4)At leat Dharma Kshetra got one thing right Drona refused Karna celestial weapons because he was a suta putra not education so thumps up for this

5)Again putting the blame on Krishna ji for Karna's rejection in Draupadi's swayambar .This was solely and only Draupadi's decision and no one else's

6)The first claim that Draupadi married Arjuna in order to destroy Drona is itself wrong and not based on the epic.There was no planning from Draupadi's side ,Draupadi didnt even know Arjuna was there 😆 she thought she married a brahmin.And she married the one and only person who hit the fish's eye.This claim has no relevance

1)Bhim standing up for Draupadi😳.Awww chalo lets start a patoyigita now

2)Didnt understand Draupadi's reply to Karna?Why would Duryodhan interfere in Karna's married life?Why would he ask Karna to send away the daughter of a powerful ally like Drupad had Draupadi been Karna's wife?Draupadi was an enemy as she was Pandvas wife as Karna's wife she would have been an ally

3)Chalo here also the fake story of Draupadi laughing at Duryodhan when actually Arjuna,Bhima ,Sahdev and Nakul laughed

4)Is this the trial of Draupadi or Krishna ji?

5)Second claim is also baseless😆 pandavas never fought for or because of Draupadi .They only and only fought for land and Draupadi got her justice as a consequence of that.As for Draupadi giving right direction to their skills hmm no.Whatever Draupadi said or did was of no importance whatsoever as pandavas went in for peace treaty anyways .They only wanted their kingdom back that is all no revenge once kingdom was refused they went in for war

6)Third claim is also baseless for the last time war wasn't fought for Draupadi's honor yes Draupadi wanted war that was a separate issue but it wasn't for or because of her.So Suyodhan's claim was baseless that last reason for the war was that Suyodhan himself refused peace