II2 was a let down II3 is a come back

167495 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1
I think with the talent Indian Idol 1 had immense talent. All eleven contestants (not including Ravinder Ravi) should've been an Idol in itself. Where as Indian Idol 2 lost quite some scope and also went down with talent I mean 50% of the final contestants did not even know how to sing e.g. Ravi, also people were voting biasedly, they were not judging singing but looks or where the contestant lives but now I think Indian Idol 3 has made the series BACK IN ACTION and the talent is seeming to reach the skies, Indian Idol 3 is more successful than Indian Idol 2. But point Indian Idol 3 is missing that is Sonu and Farah, But anyway INDIAN IDOL 1 is the BEST!

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

762

Users

9

Frequent Posters

lily008 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
i don't think that Indian Idol 2 was bad..
they were awesome singers in Indian Idol 2..like Karunya, Amey Datey, Meenal, Antara, Monali n many more i dont remember there names though
Ms. Bholi Bhali thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
I don't agree. Indian Idol 2 was equally good. there were only 1-2 ppl like Ravi, Jolly and that new guy from Hemachal who weren't that good. but rest were quite good and had great talent.
priya.shah01 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
who was the winner of indian idol 2?
anna143 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#5
Indian Idol 1 and 2 both thumbs down.
Indian Idol 3 is going to be the bestttttttt, with so many good singers already, rather than bad singers turning into good ones as we have seen in the past II 1 and 2.
Plus my emoooooooooooo is in II3 😳 lol
167495 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#6
Emon is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😡
Emon 😳
😉
Dabulls23 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#7
Indian Idol was equally good and some singers were even better than II 1 in II 2. Karunya, Amey Daate, Meenal etc.
104869 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#8
For starters i will say II3 is better produced and edited than II2.

In II2 there was a lot of scenes on the contestants background with all the rona-dhona in the auditions round itself. But this time around the editing has been crisp. The show is fast moving. They are not over exposing the good singers. The show is humorous, and dramatic.

siddh_v thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#9
Are u kidding INdian Idol 2 had lots of good singers Amey, Karunya, Meenal, Monali, Sagar it wasnt a let down. Yes offcourse the results sucked of Indian Idol2 but thats totally a diffrent story.

priya_al thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: siddh_v

Are u kidding INdian Idol 2 had lots of good singers Amey, Karunya, Meenal, Monali, Sagar it wasnt a let down. Yes offcourse the results sucked of Indian Idol2 but thats totally a diffrent story.


yah.. n tat was just cos ppl were lazying arnd n ppl who din deserve much publicity were hyped

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".