The voice against injustice at I-F!!Mod note Pg34&36 - Page 27

Created

Last reply

Replies

273

Views

15k

Users

32

Likes

945

Frequent Posters

aadk thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
At one side,we get to hear that justice is always a neutral one,irrespective of anything else!!And on the other side,we are told that justice will only be bsed on the choice of majority!!!
Way to go mods!!!!
714873 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Mods my question is here, since the system involves standing up against complete adminstration and against mentors, do you expect the majority to stand up for this cause. It takes only brave ones to fight for the right
TBDRESS thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
This is my final reply and the rest will be done by upper DT.

The banner voting held in the section, mids were caught and we decided not to count them and disqualified the entries. By going through the whole pages, people just votes for the same exact numbers. obviously, people have choices, different likes, but choosing same banners gives you indication that cheating is taking place.. And FYI, the revoting happened with the 28 banners in the DT section... yes, you all are saying members are scared off me becausei;m a moderator and they want to win my trust? then how cum higher people voted for my bannerr in the DT section without knowing that it's my banner? now, if you'll say i told them too then it will be not right because i don't know half of them people! I don't careif the BC is scarppaed but it will be unfair to other 3 people as well. And after 28th banners, depending on the likes, we choosed the top 4 banners because others were having less likes. People here wanted screenshots we''ve provided, we did the revoting (not because we're wrong) just because you wanted to revote and members should be given a chance) but seems like you're not happy because some of your choice banners didn't made it to the final round, and i completely understand. if this point is being noted then next question will pop up' how cum moderator made a post'? ... so u see, nothing is gonna sort out.. we're giving u answers but you all come up with next mod query... Now, if you'll say, moderator have no right to take part in the BC, then it's not a rule anywhere, you can ask the gms/admins.. it's allowed.. nobody on IF have problem with moderators taking part in bc.. this is the first case..


This is my last reply because this is exactly i'm saying from starting.. Rest will be said by others.
Yes, i forgot to inform you about cheating, that'sthe only mistake.. but what guranttee you can give that after informing as well , you would not have raised questions? because we're seeing how things are shaping up😊
Sano, you completely side stepped my question...here it is again: Please answer this question for me,
I'm sorry Sano but I am having a difficult time understanding this logic:
If we keep all 28 banners up for a 2nd vote...cheating will happen
But if we keep only 4 banners up for a 2nd vote...cheating will not happen
How do you come up with this conclusion?? How is cheating related to the number of banners?? I really don't follow!
Edited by Walden - 12 years ago
TBDRESS thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: aadk

At one side,we get to hear that justice is always a neutral one,irrespective of anything else!!And on the other side,we are told that justice will only be bsed on the choice of majority!!!

Way to go mods!!!!

Last time I checked, justice was supposed to be blind...didn't know that giving into the wishes of the "majority" is justice!!! I have never come across this definition of "Justice."
If the mods are going to go with the wishes of the "majority," please go ahead- but please, its a sincere request, don't disguise this as "justice."
714873 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
May i know the definition of Majority here? If mods are talking about members of forum then its clear how all the votes reverted to banner 1 after revealing that 1st banner belong to a Mod. And if majority includes opinion of DT section then again it will be disguised, and moreover its clear that whom dt will favor?
aadk thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
The birth of justice is when we walk beyond the boudaries of 'mine' and 'thine' to a place where its just us and our beliefs,uninfluenced by the hue and cry of the world!!Why is our ability to judge affected by the weight of the majority?Favouring the majority is the most safest and the easiest of the ways to escape the whole big world standing against us belittling our individuality!!Cant we just for a moment rise above the worldly demarcations like minority and majority and think for ourselves?One can satisfy a large section of the society by going with the flow,but it requires that immense strength to speak out to the world that you are by the side of the ones who are less in number but not in their convictions!!A decision influenced by the majority can only propogate the idea of justice being bent towards the end having a greater head count!!
Whatever may be the decision that we would get to hear,it can either be called Justice or nothing!! We dont need half baked versions of justice!!
Edited by aadk - 12 years ago
714873 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
I guess we will get justice this time. Only majority can't be a parameter for a particular decision, because here its not about voting among different opinions and selecting best of one, here the matter is about standing for a right cause, and i find only handful were there, if we turn pages of history who started movement for right cause, had it been the matter of majority and minority, this right cause would have been trashed.
Edited by Pari117 - 12 years ago
714873 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
at one side we cant accept this unfairness so we dont want a banner that is outcome of such system
at another side i can read people dont want old banner

cant we have a decision that is apt to both of us?
714873 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: tannipartner

Since I have been trying to explain the whole process since yesterday this is my one last try to explain it again. Then I am out. I have explained it individually to members on discussion thread and via pms. Also that I cannot consider viewpoint of only 1 side of members ignoring others. If I have to be fair, I have to be fair to everyone here. Hence once more, the whole process how it happened. If it still is murky, so be it.



  • All Banners put up for voting
  • Banner Voting deadline , voting closed. Votes come for ALL banners
  • Counting done by me.
  • MID checks done by Sano
  • Those members contacted.
  • Those banners disqualified, counting includes some MID votes as well.
  • Neutral intervention seeked out, ALL banners except the disqualified one put up again for voting on DT section [ Screen shots later provided by me out here to show the voting process]
  • Top 4 Banners again put out for another round of voting in DT section, Entry#1 wins
  • Entry#1 is revealed to be made by Sano.
  • Results declared. Members are not happy, so voting details demanded.
  • Voting information cannot be leaked out, but still screenshots provided as a one time exception. [ It took me around 2 hours to make those screenshots]
  • Members still dissatisfied.
  • Final 4 banners again put up for voting.
  • Members still dissatisfied.
  • Their demand: It is injustice to put up those 4 banners, which have been legitimately selected by voting, voting results displayed.
  • Process apparantly is murky.
  • How the process can be more transparent?
  • members demand banner made by Sano removed and Ids of other banner makers revealed.
  • IDs revealed, banner of Sano not removed.
  • If Sano's banner is removed coz of revealed ID and voting is redone, banners of top4 and also some other members will have to be removed since everyone at this point knows who made which banner and the lobbying that went for them.

a very simple question for you tanni
here is the screen shot posted by you
http://i.imgur.com/KDw4Inz.jpg
have a look on the time this post was made and see the time of edit

Post was made on 19th february, 2013 at 12:24 pm and edited on 19th february, 2013 at 12:18 pm

can edit time ever be before time of making the post???

i request you to please clear this out.
Edited by Pari117 - 12 years ago
aadk thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago



Tanni,one can see the FB advertisement slightly visible by the side of the banner in the screenshot.Sch FB advertisements are seen only on the first pages of the forum or in the inner pages of any thread(Not on the first page of the main thread).You can check this for yourself!! So,going by this logic,does this mean the so called BC organised by you guys at the coolbie and videobie sections was not in a separate thread but ws rather a part of an already existing thread!!! This itself shows how this particular BC for a forum has been treated in the DT section and the efforts that have gone into making this contest a fair one!!!
So,I kindly request you to clear the things here!!!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".