Originally posted by: -Paulomi-
</div><div>the post which u have mentioned is written by a member of the forum not by someone from ph and she wrote what she feelsin the video ishaan said,"pehle bhi SN ek aurat sambhaalti thi aur aaj bhi ek aurat hi sambhaalti hai" but he didn't say that rishi is jobless and moreover ghar aurte hi sambhaalti haiand i remember the 14th oct epi when rishi was getting ready to go to office in his lawyer's attire that clearly shows that he is not jobless and moreover the 4th sept epi also when he took the letter from the postman which was indira's at that time also he was in his lawyer's attireso i think here also no more proof is required
Exactly paulomi our proofs are directly frm d epi frm what we clearly see and hear. There are expressins and body language also shown in d epi along wid d dialogues wich give you a positive or negative feel regarding a character and they have to b considered
Now what can i say to those who dont wish to go to that minute level and view a superficial version of d scenes or create their own scenes !