Kaahe ki saas aur kaahe ki bahuen

Makers give such importance to Guddan as a Saas but why do they forget she is a step-mom first and saas later? The sons give her the saas status. I know they don't need her as they are older than her and grown-up but give some role to the sons too, atleast show some bonding between them, wo to kuch nahi bas muft ki saas ban gayi aur muft me 3 badi bahuein mil gayi.

And this show was about youngest saas as Guddan so they shouldn't have made villains out of Saru and Durga. Aam villains bhi nahi but full on vamps who can't be redeemed. Initially they were grey but now they are vamps who need to kicked out and put in jail. So the whole premise and concept of the show is hurt due to them turning full on vamps. Now showing saas bahu drama and Guddan taking up challenges to be an adarsh saas and dosti shit with bahus etc etc doesn't make sense. Why show build up of her development as a saas, criminals hai bahar phenko unhe..it just fits with Lakshmi. She is the only good bahu left for now and she is already on her side so the whole concept is meaningless. Now if Guddan and AJ forgive Durga and Saru like I know they will, tab to Kya hi bolun... Criminals ko maaf karne hi mahanata to Kar hi chuke hai and it will continue...

I know they will forgive them warna ye Sara development of Guddan as the youngest saas ko kyu dikhate

It’s turning into k serious wahi bakwas wahi mahanta of leads and vamps for life

I had hoped this show is different but nothing can be unique on tv wahi kisi pithi saas bahu drama here sasur is only different rest same bakwas

Originally posted by: rs-shailu29

It’s turning into k serious wahi bakwas wahi mahanta of leads and vamps for life

I had hoped this show is different but nothing can be unique on tv wahi kisi pithi saas bahu drama here sasur is only different rest same bakwas

Haan drama to wohi hai .... Only good thing is AkshAn.. atleast usko destroy na karen... Which I hope they won't ..

CVS they forget she is a step-mom. Everything revolves around the Bahu and nobody cares about the sons of that house. One son and we do not know what he looks like haha Great support for Bahus but nobody even thinks about the sons. What a Saas when she has not yet managed to be a mother to sons.

Sons are grown up they didn't need a mom now. Why to perfect what is already perfect ?

Sons are settled, obedient & happy in their own places. By happy I mean what is going inside house, none of their business. So with Guddu or without Guddu nothing changes for them.

But the bahus needed a saas to bring balance in the household & control the house.

Mainly the house needed a saas or else in long term 3 bahus with different ambitions going different directions the household would have crashed if one force doesn't bind them in a limit.

& bahus wanted saas for their own selfish reasons.

Originally posted by: captainplus

Sons are grown up they didn't need a mom now. Why to perfect what is already perfect ?

Sons are settled, obedient & happy in their own places. By happy I mean what is going inside house, none of their business. So with Guddu or without Guddu nothing changes for them.

But the bahus needed a saas to bring balance in the household & control the house.

Mainly the house needed a saas or else in long term 3 bahus with different ambitions going different directions the household would have crashed if one force doesn't bind them in a limit.

& bahus wanted saas for their own selfish reasons.

First I did not want to answer your comment, but now I want to.

Perfect? What is perfect when Guddan and sons do not have relationship? If there is no relationship, then how perfect is it?

Happy sons who say they're happy? As far as I know they can not even make a decision on their own, they have to ask AJ? Is that called happiness? Perhaps the sons do not need a mother, but if Guddan is not a mother, then how is she the mother-in-law?

Bahu wanted a Saas and they got it Saas.

Originally posted by: sumatra1234

First I did not want to answer your comment, but now I want to.

Perfect? What is perfect when Guddan and sons do not have relationship? If there is no relationship, then how perfect is it?

Happy sons who say they're happy? As far as I know they can not even make a decision on their own, they have to ask AJ? Is that called happiness? Perhaps the sons do not need a mother, but if Guddan is not a mother, then how is she the mother-in-law?

Bahu wanted a Saas and they got it Saas.

Reminder just in case :- My comment has been quoted & it had nothing to do with yours. I am only replying cause you have quoted mine & questioned.

1st of all read carefully I didn't use the word "perfect" with regards to Guddu & son's relation.

I used it in regards to them as a whole that the sons don't need a mom now. That place of their mom in the household doesn't need to be touched. At this stage with a mom & without doesn't change a thing for them.

& its in my view sons are happy & I wrote it clearly in which sense they are happy. Even if they are not happy, we can't clearly claim so with the limited glimpses of them & zero insides to their thoughts.

Even I don't make any decision without asking my parents so is that enough to conclude I am not happy ? I know sons are not me, they are different but in this case while living in a joint family with a father figure, both they or me are bound to ask the head authorities of the house before making any decisions.

As far as I have seen they were seen asking AJ what is necessary i.e. related to business which impacts the whole family not just them.

About this,

if Guddan is not a mother, then how is she the mother-in-law ?

They call her Guddan maa & give her the assorted respect in that sense which automatically gives her the position of their wives Mother-in-law. To become Mother-In-Law, she doesn't need to press their clothes, pack their tiffins or comb their hair.

Originally posted by: captainplus

Reminder just in case :- My comment has been quoted & it had nothing to do with yours. I am only replying cause you have quoted mine & questioned.

1st of all read carefully I didn't use the word "perfect" with regards to Guddu & son's relation.

I used it in regards to them as a whole that the sons don't need a mom now. That place of their mom in the household doesn't need to be touched. At this stage with a mom & without doesn't change a thing for them.

& its in my view sons are happy & I wrote it clearly in which sense they are happy. Even if they are not happy, we can't clearly claim so with the limited glimpses of them & zero insides to their thoughts.

Even I don't make any decision without asking my parents so is that enough to conclude I am not happy ? I know sons are not me, they are different but in this case while living in a joint family with a father figure, both they or me are bound to ask the head authorities of the house before making any decisions.

As far as I have seen they were seen asking AJ what is necessary i.e. related to business which impacts the whole family not just them.

About this,

if Guddan is not a mother, then how is she the mother-in-law ?

They call her Guddan maa & give her the assorted respect in that sense which automatically gives her the position of their wives Mother-in-law. To become Mother-In-Law, she doesn't need to press their clothes, pack their tiffins or comb their hair.

With you I really can not talk. You write one, and then explain it differently. There's no need to talk to you. I'm just getting upset.

Saas drama is seriously too much over done and quite bore 👎🏼🙄

Originally posted by: captainplus

Reminder just in case :- My comment has been quoted & it had nothing to do with yours. I am only replying cause you have quoted mine & questioned.

1st of all read carefully I didn't use the word "perfect" with regards to Guddu & son's relation.

I used it in regards to them as a whole that the sons don't need a mom now. That place of their mom in the household doesn't need to be touched. At this stage with a mom & without doesn't change a thing for them.

& its in my view sons are happy & I wrote it clearly in which sense they are happy. Even if they are not happy, we can't clearly claim so with the limited glimpses of them & zero insides to their thoughts.

Even I don't make any decision without asking my parents so is that enough to conclude I am not happy ? I know sons are not me, they are different but in this case while living in a joint family with a father figure, both they or me are bound to ask the head authorities of the house before making any decisions.

As far as I have seen they were seen asking AJ what is necessary i.e. related to business which impacts the whole family not just them.

About this,

if Guddan is not a mother, then how is she the mother-in-law ?

They call her Guddan maa & give her the assorted respect in that sense which automatically gives her the position of their wives Mother-in-law. To become Mother-In-Law, she doesn't need to press their clothes, pack their tiffins or comb their hair.

I completely agree to every word you wrote above.

I'm an adult, so is my brother. We still ask our parents for permissions and opinions, that's what happens in families. That's how we work. Asking for permissions is not equal to unhappiness. And they care for her, call her maa and worry about her safety. That's enough to establish relationship as mother - son.