Since Ghum has conveniently aired selective usage of rules in the episode, making a note of CARA rules here...
The rule that favours Pakrat has only been considered and the ones that favour Sai has been disregarded. I am only raising these points because they showed selective law. If it was only zillat fight, I wouldn't have bothered.
Vinu was eligible for adoption as he fits in criteria (a)
Child eligible for adoption.―The following shall be eligible for adoption, namely:―(a) any orphan or abandoned or surrendered child, declared legally free for adoption by the Child Welfare Committee;(
b) a child of a relative defined under clause (52) of section 2;
(c) child or children of spouse from earlier marriage, surrendered by the biological parents for adoption by the step-parent.
Eligibility criteria for prospective adoptive parents.―
(1)The prospective adoptive parents shall be physically, mentally, emotionally, and financially capable, they shall not have any life-threatening medical condition and they should not have been convicted in a criminal act of any nature or accused in any case of child rights violation.
- The point here is that "convicted in a criminal case". Patralekha was never convicted. She was accused and the family took back the complaint which led to Sai walking out
Rule Ignored
No child shall be given in adoption to a couple unless they have at least two years of stable marital relationship- except in the cases of relative or step-parent adoption,
Patralekha and Virat were not married when they decided to adopt Vinu.
Edited by nutmeg7 - 2 years ago