The way V behaves, he is 100% capable of raising questions on Sai's character and Savi's paternity.
he cannot eventually get away scot free like in Shruti track where all his sins were washed away by Sai herself in a press conference where she took the fall for everything thereby giving him a "clean chit". V never apologized to Sai for what he put her through during Shruti kaand. He didn't even introspect and realize how hurt Sai must have been. He cannot do that one more time. Then and now Virat is solely responsible for everything happening.. he allowed P to interfere always, he allowed surrogacy, he tolerated P, picked her over Sai over and over again, he made Sai leave and broke her to the point where she chose to live alone, he didnt search for her enough, he assumed her dead, he chose to adopt, he married P and he is the one has amnesia about P and his own crimes. So NO, he should not be allowed to get away this time by blaming Sai. He needs to lose. But i dont trust makers to have any sense of justice or appropriateness. They endorse both illegal and immoral. they have shown illegal surrogacy with no actual consequences other than namesake revelation of crimes, now they are showing bigamy and an illegal adoption - a child adopted by 2 criminals who have not correctly fulfilled the terms laid by the orphanage. Neither were they qualified to adopt, nor did they appropriately follow the rules of the orphanage. They hoodwinked the system for personal gains. once again I dont see V or P paying for their crimes. The narrative shows that makers just want to whitewash V , P, blame "circumstances" , rather than clearly call them out for creating those circumstances themselves. They simply make them look "unhappy" despite having everything to make it seem as if they have also "suffered" but thats immaterial if they have not been called out as the ones responsible for all the problems. V and P "suffering" is not enough, they needs to suffer knowing that they are the cause of all this and an innocent Sai , and Savi, Vinu to an extent - have all paid due to THEIR mistakes. Especially V.
Sai suffering is unfair and V is responsible for it.
Savi not having a father is unfair to the kid and V is responsible for it.
Vinu not having his real mother around and having trouble walking, living as an orphan and now with the label of being "adopted" is ALL Vs fault.
P contributed but even that is Vs fault. If he had not enabled her , allowed her interference, if he had trusted Sai, if he had ensured P didnt return to their lives- none of this would have happened.
If anyone should be character assasinated it is V for marrying his bhabhi who was his ex-lover right after his wifes death and for parenting a child with her even if its not their biological child.
It seems like makers and a section of the audience think that just cos V is not "happy" himself so thats his punishment. But NO. Thats not enough. Him being a devdas or going on suicide missions or not having sex with his new wife and being unhappy from within is not enough. Thats not his payback. Because without the realization that he is the CAUSE of EVERYONE'S suffering it's not adequate. He cannot blame circumstances. He created those circumstances. He made not one but like 50,000 mistakes and also committed crimes. So him doing right by Vinu, saving Savi, or standing up for Sai's professionalism and qualifications for the orphanage is not enough. Because we can see how he acts. He convinced Sai to take the job, realized that she was well-qualified and a good candidate for it but eventually turns around and behaves as if he did her a "favor" giving her the job. He has ALWAYS done this- counting favors done by him, allowances given by him. The audacity is %*$* . Thats how pathetic he is. He has this delusion where he feels as if he is such a good guy who has done a lot for Sai, more than she deserves but thats not true. Firstly, its not a competition, but if it was Sai has done WAY more for him and tolerated WAY more heartache, pain- physical and emotional because of him than V has. So its about time that he accepts that and lives the rest of his life in that guilt and spends his life "trying to" make up for it all.
Sai has suffered for no fault of hers. Sai's only fault was to trust V and love him despite his every indiscretion. So no, V claiming how he was "zinda laash" is insufficient. Him feeling guilty for letting Sai leave is NOT the same as acknowledging his crimes. His guilt also has been for the wrong thing. He needs to feel guilty for everything else. Sai leaving and him not stopping her was just a consequence of ALL his other mistakes.
Edited by Nja91 - 2 years ago