Originally posted by: Sherry24
There are a few things that I ethically and morally feel incorrect. But then when has Ghum really considered any of it.
As per promo Sai and P have a kid each with them. It is V, whose whereabouts are uncertain.
Now I agree the promo can be misleading. So could this be P’s delusion? And she is in asylum where she keeps dreaming about a life like this?
Could this be a parallel families being supported by V, where Sai is no longer in a spousal equation with V, but she lets him be with their daughter?
There is a possibility of a leap which we will know of later. If they consciously got a younger girl to play the daughter it has to tied up. They may end Sat episode at some crossroads or cliffhanger and Monday they will jump to the bigger leap. The suspense of the changed equations will be revealed in a flashback referring which will constitute the mini leap a lil later.
I wouldn’t say that I don’t see this happening, but there is something which is disturbing me here. SH track Sai was eventually blamed and if this happens she will be blamed again. They have crossed that stage of trust. This is something else. About individual thoughts and views.
I know we have had these discussions before about husband and wife bearing the repercussions together for the deeds of one. And I completely agree as they are one unit. But it is unfair to always expect the wife to sacrifice because the husband decides so. They make decisions on each other’s behalf. But they cannot snatch away their rights. That’s unacceptable. V has done that repeatedly. He promises her his support and then himself snatches it away from her. Is that not betrayal? He took away the right with illegal surrogacy after promising to go by her choice. Now after reassuring her at every step that it is their baby, he will give him to P to raise. Is that fair to a mother? Even now with the ask of P raising the baby, it is Sai’s right that he is snatching away from her. Who is losing? V will have full access unlike Sai? A marriage along with partnership requires equality and respect. Just because Sai is stronger he was not by her side when she suffered a miscarriage. Is that her fault. Now because P is attempting suicide he will give the baby to P. Wife is also an individual, a human being who feels pain, and he has no right to put her through all this just because he wants to do justice to someone else or lessen someone else’s pain.
Tomorrow we will have that scene where V give the baby to P. Sai will be standing there witnessing this. Is it right to do injustice to one just because she is the spouse and is emotionally stronger?
I deviated from the post. But it was kind of pinching me since long. Where is V’s punishment for all that he did? He will eventually come out as someone who sacrificed and Sai will again be called out.
The family is seeing P’s state because she gave them the baby. Everyone is sympathetic towards her. V will try to justify his act to Sai. But is it fair to her?
In his defence, if we look at V’s actions he is just being sympathetic and considerate about P’s situation. He is not aware of P’s evil plans. But in all this why should Sai be the one to apologise eventually. If she leaves it will be because of his actions. It is not because she doesn’t trust him.
He has wronged her repeatedly and never apologised for it. And yet he comes out shining.
1.7k