|GHKPM Social Media Updates Thread

First Previous

Page

121

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sherry24

@Sherry24

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 3 years ago

#1141

He differentiates right and wrong more on the societal grounds that are more or else clearly stated. But more subtle aspects which are not clearly laid out in words is beyond his understanding and control. So when it comes to emotions and sentiments he doesn’t no where to draw a line and gets carried away. And the fact that he has this fetish for sacrifice and being proclaimed mahaan. And anyone who agrees with him gets a free pass, however wrong they maybe

Quote

Shaome

@Shaome

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 3 years ago

#1142

The basic essence of the original kd is completely ruined by Ghum makers.. They didn't understand Rono's inner self up until now Sai was well written still better than Virat..

Rono was a jerk.. He had this god complex and loves yes people to be around.. That's why he loved those attention from Shruti and Pakhi.. But he always maintained physical distance.. He really needed Emon.. That basic thing is missing in ghum.. The one you love the most always you would want to feel the warmth..

Since many have pointed out if no sai in the picture and Sam missing Virat would not be able to maintain his boundary.. Yeah it's truth.. That's how the makers have given such impression about this character.. But in the original even though with Rupkatha Rono deeper bond than virat with Pakhi still he was only only attracted to Emon so having no emon in the picture he wouldn't cross the boundary.. Here that beauty is missing..she

Ghum makers shove soul connection on us but in practice Virat actually went overboard with other women.. Then He did feel that rush over feelings the moment he met Sai on stage.. The idea of being in love with Pakhi was so superficial and virat accepted that ..wished only makers didn't show those extra creativity for virakhi scenes post sairat marriage.. That scene when he holds Pakhi's hand hugging his wife was so disgusting..

Now coming to his dynamics with Shruti is still confusing one.. It was implied that he would be happy to live with her like this.. However rono was wooden and a**hole but even in that track he needed Emon.. All thanks to Neil and writers who could not bring out that basic this in track.

Ghum is ruined partly for favoritism towards certain actors and lack of understanding of the story what leena wanted to say.. Mindless coppypasting always destroy the beauty

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Sherry24

@Sherry24

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 3 years ago

#1143

True. It is very crucial to understand and retain the essence of a story during adaptation. And from what I have heard of KD so far, Ghum has failed miserably at that. The problem is they are only focusing on the plot/events without following the sequence, how the story flows and how each incident is stitched to the other, displaying the logical progression. They are just fitting together scenes, with their own creativity to accommodate extra curricular interests. That is not making sense and is only making it toxic and regressive. ML is flawed, in both versions. But the intention was to create someone who is good at heart and has no vile intentions for anyone, so that the audience sympathises despite the flaw. Ghum failed to bring that out. And hence the dislike. What they thought was goodness actually extended into a flaw not to be forgiven.

Edited by sherry_24 - 3 years ago

Quote

Lady_Macbeth

@Peronal_pixie

Explorer

Posted: 3 years ago

#1144

I don't think I implied that one should ignore the trolling Ayesha receives because it's lesser compared to someone else (or that she is not trolled at all). I was just trying to highlight that relentless, excessive trolling that the duo receives (as I have noticed in SM) can become very difficult to withstand. Nor did I imply that Ayesha should not speak about the abuses hurled at her - she is perfectly within her rights to voice it out. Ayesha is the superior among the trio as far as the acting is concerned. She will still need luck and/or contacts to make her way forward from here on in the industry - but with her talent, there is a reasonable probability of her finding success. Promotion of the lead pair will neither help/stall her progress. Actors well-loved by audience find themselves out of work and mediocre ones get great projects if luck would have it.

Anyways, my argument was objective and impassioned - that the high standards set of celebrities/humans can sway audience sensibilities to have a more judgemental opinion about the same than is required. The passionate responses to my post - I honestly don't understand what was so offensive about my opinion. Makes me realise I don't want to argue over people whom I don't know and in any case are earning sufficient money. If I sounded like I was attacking others opinion, I apologise - my objective was only to give an alternate pov.

Not going to extend this discussion. Thank you & cheers 😊

Edited by Lady_Macbeth - 3 years ago